[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240411185517.153a7dff@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2024 18:55:17 -0700
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Lee Jones <lee@...nel.org>, Min Li <lnimi@...mail.com>
Cc: richardcochran@...il.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, Min Li <min.li.xe@...esas.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 1/1] ptp: 82p33: move register definitions
out of ptp folder
On Thu, 11 Apr 2024 17:32:40 +0100 Lee Jones wrote:
> > From: Min Li <min.li.xe@...esas.com>
> >
> > Relocate idt82p33 register definitions so that other multi-functional
> > devices can access those definitions.
What I was asking for was to mention the other drivers which will make
use of the header _in the future_.
Really, it'd be best if the patch was part of a patchset which adds
a driver that needs it...
> > Signed-off-by: Min Li <min.li.xe@...esas.com>
> > ---
> > Submit to net-next and add driver name suggested by Jakub
> >
> > drivers/ptp/ptp_idt82p33.h | 27 -----------------------
> > include/linux/mfd/idt82p33_reg.h | 38 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
>
> Why does this need to go into net-next?
No preference here, FWIW
Powered by blists - more mailing lists