[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240412073527.GO2399047@google.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2024 08:35:27 +0100
From: Lee Jones <lee@...nel.org>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc: Min Li <lnimi@...mail.com>, richardcochran@...il.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Min Li <min.li.xe@...esas.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 1/1] ptp: 82p33: move register definitions
out of ptp folder
On Thu, 11 Apr 2024, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Thu, 11 Apr 2024 17:32:40 +0100 Lee Jones wrote:
> > > From: Min Li <min.li.xe@...esas.com>
> > >
> > > Relocate idt82p33 register definitions so that other multi-functional
> > > devices can access those definitions.
>
> What I was asking for was to mention the other drivers which will make
> use of the header _in the future_.
>
> Really, it'd be best if the patch was part of a patchset which adds
> a driver that needs it...
100%
> > > Signed-off-by: Min Li <min.li.xe@...esas.com>
> > > ---
> > > Submit to net-next and add driver name suggested by Jakub
> > >
> > > drivers/ptp/ptp_idt82p33.h | 27 -----------------------
> > > include/linux/mfd/idt82p33_reg.h | 38 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
> >
> > Why does this need to go into net-next?
>
> No preference here, FWIW
--
Lee Jones [李琼斯]
Powered by blists - more mailing lists