[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6877aa3a-3147-4cfd-892b-f23a2b3a1ffd@loongson.cn>
Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2024 17:51:43 +0800
From: Yanteng Si <siyanteng@...ngson.cn>
To: Serge Semin <fancer.lancer@...il.com>
Cc: andrew@...n.ch, hkallweit1@...il.com, peppe.cavallaro@...com,
alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com, joabreu@...opsys.com, Jose.Abreu@...opsys.com,
chenhuacai@...nel.org, linux@...linux.org.uk, guyinggang@...ngson.cn,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, chris.chenfeiyang@...il.com, siyanteng01@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v11 2/6] net: stmmac: Add multi-channel support
在 2024/4/19 17:17, Serge Semin 写道:
> The change in the patch 2/6 concerns the_generic_ DW MAC DMA IRQ
> handler. You can't change the mask here without justification.
> Moreover the generic DW MAC doesn't have the status flags behind the
> mask you set. That's why earlier we find out a solution with creating
> the Loongson-specific DMA IRQ-handler. You have it implemented in the
> patch 6/6.
Sorry, I misinterpreted your comment earlier.
>
> So my question was mostly rhetorical. You should have dropped the mask
> change in this patch ever since the Loongson-specific DMA
> IRQ-handler was added to your series.
I see. I'll restore this mask.
Thanks,
Yanteng
Powered by blists - more mailing lists