lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240422100809.GA9873@linuxonhyperv3.guj3yctzbm1etfxqx2vob5hsef.xx.internal.cloudapp.net>
Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2024 03:08:09 -0700
From: Shradha Gupta <shradhagupta@...ux.microsoft.com>
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Cc: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>, Zhu Yanjun <yanjun.zhu@...ux.dev>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-hyperv@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
	Ajay Sharma <sharmaajay@...rosoft.com>,
	Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
	"K. Y. Srinivasan" <kys@...rosoft.com>,
	Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@...rosoft.com>,
	Wei Liu <wei.liu@...nel.org>, Dexuan Cui <decui@...rosoft.com>,
	Long Li <longli@...rosoft.com>,
	Michael Kelley <mikelley@...rosoft.com>,
	Shradha Gupta <shradhagupta@...rosoft.com>,
	Yury Norov <yury.norov@...il.com>,
	Konstantin Taranov <kotaranov@...rosoft.com>,
	Souradeep Chakrabarti <schakrabarti@...ux.microsoft.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net: mana: Add new device attributes for mana

On Fri, Apr 19, 2024 at 08:51:02PM +0200, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 19, 2024 at 09:59:26AM -0700, Shradha Gupta wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 18, 2024 at 08:42:59PM +0200, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> > > > >From an RDMA perspective this is all available from other APIs already
> > > > at least and I wouldn't want to see new sysfs unless there is a netdev
> > > > justification.
> > > 
> > > It is unlikely there is a netdev justification. Configuration happens
> > > via netlink, not sysfs.
> > > 
> > >     Andrew
> > 
> > Thanks. Sure, it makes sense to make the generic attribute configurable
> > through the netdevice ops or netlink implementation. I will keep that in
> > mind while adding the next set of configuration attributes for the driver.
> > These attributes(from the patch) however, are hardware specific(that show
> > the maximum supported values by the hardware in most cases).
> 
>         ndev->max_mtu = gc->adapter_mtu - ETH_HLEN;
>         ndev->min_mtu = ETH_MIN_MTU;
> 
> This does not appear to be specific to your device. This is very
> generic. We already have /sys/class/net/eth42/mtu, why not add
> /sys/class/net/eth42/max_mtu and /sys/class/net/eth42/min_mtu for
> every driver?
> 
> Are these values really hardware specific? Are they really unique to
> your hardware? I have to wounder because you clearly did not think
> much about MTU, and how it is actually generic...
> 
>      Andrew
That makes sense. I will make these as generic attributes in the next version.
Thanks.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ