netdev - Re: [PATCH] net: bridge: remove redundant check of f->dst

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <054555f3-4a59-4f99-9b32-244f466c4ae6@blackwall.org>
Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2024 15:17:42 +0300
From: Nikolay Aleksandrov <razor@...ckwall.org>
To: linke li <lilinke99@...com>
Cc: bridge@...ts.linux.dev, davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com,
 kuba@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
 pabeni@...hat.com, roopa@...dia.com, xujianhao01@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: bridge: remove redundant check of f->dst

On 4/23/24 14:58, linke li wrote:
> Thanks for your advice! Should I submit another patch with subject
> "[PATCH net-next] net: bridge: remove redundant check of f->dst" or
> "[PATCH net-next v2] net: bridge: remove redundant check of f->dst"?
> 

Please don't delete the whole thread, just reply below it and snip any 
unnecessary big chunks if needed. As to your question - maintainers
usually take care of this so re-submission is not necessary but in case
they request a re-submission please wait 24 hours before sending another
version. v2 is expected in the subject, also please add a small 
description of what changed in v2.

Thanks,
  Nik