[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <tencent_5C4968C62CB4BF868761113A754124143108@qq.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2024 19:58:45 +0800
From: linke li <lilinke99@...com>
To: razor@...ckwall.org
Cc: bridge@...ts.linux.dev,
davem@...emloft.net,
edumazet@...gle.com,
kuba@...nel.org,
lilinke99@...com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org,
pabeni@...hat.com,
roopa@...dia.com,
xujianhao01@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: bridge: remove redundant check of f->dst
Thanks for your advice! Should I submit another patch with subject
"[PATCH net-next] net: bridge: remove redundant check of f->dst" or
"[PATCH net-next v2] net: bridge: remove redundant check of f->dst"?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists