[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZikZ-5O9Ta1mkT1O@nanopsycho>
Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2024 16:40:59 +0200
From: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>
To: "Kwapulinski, Piotr" <piotr.kwapulinski@...el.com>
Cc: "intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org" <intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"horms@...nel.org" <horms@...nel.org>,
"Wyborny, Carolyn" <carolyn.wyborny@...el.com>,
"Jagielski, Jedrzej" <jedrzej.jagielski@...el.com>,
"Glaza, Jan" <jan.glaza@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH iwl-next v4 5/5] ixgbe: Enable link management in E610
device
Wed, Apr 24, 2024 at 03:49:09PM CEST, piotr.kwapulinski@...el.com wrote:
>>>-----Original Message-----
>>>From: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>
>>>Sent: Monday, April 22, 2024 4:26 PM
>>>To: Kwapulinski, Piotr <piotr.kwapulinski@...el.com>
>>>Cc: intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org; netdev@...r.kernel.org; horms@...nel.org; Wyborny, Carolyn <carolyn.wyborny@...el.com>; Jagielski, Jedrzej <jedrzej.jagielski@...el.com>; Glaza, Jan <jan.glaza@...el.com>
>>>Subject: Re: [PATCH iwl-next v4 5/5] ixgbe: Enable link management in E610 device
>>>
>>>Mon, Apr 22, 2024 at 03:06:11PM CEST, piotr.kwapulinski@...el.com wrote:
>>>
>>>[...]
>>>
>>>
>>>>diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe.h
>>>>b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe.h
>>>>index 559b443..ea6df1e 100644
>>>>--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe.h
>>>>+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe.h
>>>>@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
>>>> /* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */
>>>>-/* Copyright(c) 1999 - 2018 Intel Corporation. */
>>>>+/* Copyright(c) 1999 - 2024 Intel Corporation. */
>>>>
>>>> #ifndef _IXGBE_H_
>>>> #define _IXGBE_H_
>>>>@@ -20,6 +20,7 @@
>>>> #include "ixgbe_type.h"
>>>> #include "ixgbe_common.h"
>>>> #include "ixgbe_dcb.h"
>>>>+#include "ixgbe_e610.h"
>>>> #if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_FCOE)
>>>> #define IXGBE_FCOE
>>>> #include "ixgbe_fcoe.h"
>>>>@@ -28,7 +29,6 @@
>>>> #include <linux/dca.h>
>>>> #endif
>>>> #include "ixgbe_ipsec.h"
>>>>-
>>>
>>>Leftover hunk?
>>Will do
>I think it's better eventually to remove this blank line. What do you think ?
Does not seem to be ralated to the patch. Whatever.
>Thanks
>Piotr
Powered by blists - more mailing lists