lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACGkMEtf9twxTSGpGpmcR4LYS_k1g=NRO78NhkG4uLJ3d+TqAA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2024 10:11:55 +0800
From: Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>
To: Xuan Zhuo <xuanzhuo@...ux.alibaba.com>
Cc: virtualization@...ts.linux.dev, "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>, 
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, 
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH vhost v3 2/4] virtio_net: big mode skip the unmap check

On Wed, Apr 24, 2024 at 4:17 PM Xuan Zhuo <xuanzhuo@...ux.alibaba.com> wrote:
>
> The virtio-net big mode did not enable premapped mode,
> so we did not need to check the unmap. And the subsequent
> commit will remove the failover code for failing enable
> premapped for merge and small mode. So we need to remove
> the checking do_dma code in the big mode path.
>
> Signed-off-by: Xuan Zhuo <xuanzhuo@...ux.alibaba.com>
> ---
>  drivers/net/virtio_net.c | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
> index c22d1118a133..16d84c95779c 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
> @@ -820,7 +820,7 @@ static void virtnet_rq_unmap_free_buf(struct virtqueue *vq, void *buf)
>
>         rq = &vi->rq[i];
>
> -       if (rq->do_dma)
> +       if (!vi->big_packets || vi->mergeable_rx_bufs)

This seems to be equivalent to

if (!vi->big_packets)


>                 virtnet_rq_unmap(rq, buf, 0);
>
>         virtnet_rq_free_buf(vi, rq, buf);
> @@ -2128,7 +2128,7 @@ static int virtnet_receive(struct receive_queue *rq, int budget,
>                 }
>         } else {
>                 while (packets < budget &&
> -                      (buf = virtnet_rq_get_buf(rq, &len, NULL)) != NULL) {
> +                      (buf = virtqueue_get_buf(rq->vq, &len)) != NULL) {
>                         receive_buf(vi, rq, buf, len, NULL, xdp_xmit, &stats);
>                         packets++;
>                 }

Other part looks good.

Thanks

> --
> 2.32.0.3.g01195cf9f
>


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ