lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <000000000000d0b87206170dd88f@google.com>
Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2024 23:08:19 -0700
From: syzbot <syzbot+ec941d6e24f633a59172@...kaller.appspotmail.com>
To: andrii@...nel.org, ast@...nel.org, bpf@...r.kernel.org, 
	daniel@...earbox.net, davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com, 
	jakub@...udflare.com, john.fastabend@...il.com, kuba@...nel.org, 
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org, pabeni@...hat.com, 
	syzkaller-bugs@...glegroups.com, xrivendell7@...il.com
Subject: Re: [syzbot] [net?] [bpf?] possible deadlock in sock_hash_delete_elem (2)

syzbot has found a reproducer for the following issue on:

HEAD commit:    b2ff42c6d3ab Merge tag 'for-netdev' of https://git.kernel...
git tree:       bpf
console+strace: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/log.txt?x=157ea5e8980000
kernel config:  https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/.config?x=98d5a8e00ed1044a
dashboard link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=ec941d6e24f633a59172
compiler:       Debian clang version 15.0.6, GNU ld (GNU Binutils for Debian) 2.40
syz repro:      https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/repro.syz?x=145682f8980000
C reproducer:   https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/repro.c?x=13c06aa0980000

Downloadable assets:
disk image: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/bbdf1d091619/disk-b2ff42c6.raw.xz
vmlinux: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/4bf7c5b24257/vmlinux-b2ff42c6.xz
kernel image: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/41fcb792fc43/bzImage-b2ff42c6.xz

IMPORTANT: if you fix the issue, please add the following tag to the commit:
Reported-by: syzbot+ec941d6e24f633a59172@...kaller.appspotmail.com

============================================
WARNING: possible recursive locking detected
6.9.0-rc5-syzkaller-00171-gb2ff42c6d3ab #0 Not tainted
--------------------------------------------
syz-executor361/5090 is trying to acquire lock:
ffff888022c83260 (&htab->buckets[i].lock){+...}-{2:2}, at: spin_lock_bh include/linux/spinlock.h:356 [inline]
ffff888022c83260 (&htab->buckets[i].lock){+...}-{2:2}, at: sock_hash_delete_elem+0x17c/0x400 net/core/sock_map.c:945

but task is already holding lock:
ffff88807b2af8f8 (&htab->buckets[i].lock){+...}-{2:2}, at: spin_lock_bh include/linux/spinlock.h:356 [inline]
ffff88807b2af8f8 (&htab->buckets[i].lock){+...}-{2:2}, at: sock_hash_delete_elem+0x17c/0x400 net/core/sock_map.c:945

other info that might help us debug this:
 Possible unsafe locking scenario:

       CPU0
       ----
  lock(&htab->buckets[i].lock);
  lock(&htab->buckets[i].lock);

 *** DEADLOCK ***

 May be due to missing lock nesting notation

4 locks held by syz-executor361/5090:
 #0: ffffffff8e334d20 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: rcu_lock_acquire include/linux/rcupdate.h:329 [inline]
 #0: ffffffff8e334d20 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: rcu_read_lock include/linux/rcupdate.h:781 [inline]
 #0: ffffffff8e334d20 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: map_delete_elem+0x388/0x5e0 kernel/bpf/syscall.c:1695
 #1: ffff88807b2af8f8 (&htab->buckets[i].lock){+...}-{2:2}, at: spin_lock_bh include/linux/spinlock.h:356 [inline]
 #1: ffff88807b2af8f8 (&htab->buckets[i].lock){+...}-{2:2}, at: sock_hash_delete_elem+0x17c/0x400 net/core/sock_map.c:945
 #2: ffff88801c2a4290 (&psock->link_lock){+...}-{2:2}, at: spin_lock_bh include/linux/spinlock.h:356 [inline]
 #2: ffff88801c2a4290 (&psock->link_lock){+...}-{2:2}, at: sock_map_del_link net/core/sock_map.c:145 [inline]
 #2: ffff88801c2a4290 (&psock->link_lock){+...}-{2:2}, at: sock_map_unref+0xcc/0x5e0 net/core/sock_map.c:180
 #3: ffffffff8e334d20 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: rcu_lock_acquire include/linux/rcupdate.h:329 [inline]
 #3: ffffffff8e334d20 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: rcu_read_lock include/linux/rcupdate.h:781 [inline]
 #3: ffffffff8e334d20 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: __bpf_trace_run kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:2380 [inline]
 #3: ffffffff8e334d20 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: bpf_trace_run2+0x114/0x420 kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:2420

stack backtrace:
CPU: 1 PID: 5090 Comm: syz-executor361 Not tainted 6.9.0-rc5-syzkaller-00171-gb2ff42c6d3ab #0
Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 03/27/2024
Call Trace:
 <TASK>
 __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:88 [inline]
 dump_stack_lvl+0x241/0x360 lib/dump_stack.c:114
 check_deadlock kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3062 [inline]
 validate_chain+0x15c1/0x58e0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3856
 __lock_acquire+0x1346/0x1fd0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5137
 lock_acquire+0x1ed/0x550 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5754
 __raw_spin_lock_bh include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h:126 [inline]
 _raw_spin_lock_bh+0x35/0x50 kernel/locking/spinlock.c:178
 spin_lock_bh include/linux/spinlock.h:356 [inline]
 sock_hash_delete_elem+0x17c/0x400 net/core/sock_map.c:945
 bpf_prog_174bfe9d52de9121+0x4f/0x53
 bpf_dispatcher_nop_func include/linux/bpf.h:1234 [inline]
 __bpf_prog_run include/linux/filter.h:657 [inline]
 bpf_prog_run include/linux/filter.h:664 [inline]
 __bpf_trace_run kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:2381 [inline]
 bpf_trace_run2+0x204/0x420 kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:2420
 trace_kfree include/trace/events/kmem.h:94 [inline]
 kfree+0x2af/0x3a0 mm/slub.c:4377
 sk_psock_free_link include/linux/skmsg.h:421 [inline]
 sock_map_del_link net/core/sock_map.c:158 [inline]
 sock_map_unref+0x3ac/0x5e0 net/core/sock_map.c:180
 sock_hash_delete_elem+0x392/0x400 net/core/sock_map.c:949
 map_delete_elem+0x464/0x5e0 kernel/bpf/syscall.c:1696
 __sys_bpf+0x598/0x810 kernel/bpf/syscall.c:5651
 __do_sys_bpf kernel/bpf/syscall.c:5767 [inline]
 __se_sys_bpf kernel/bpf/syscall.c:5765 [inline]
 __x64_sys_bpf+0x7c/0x90 kernel/bpf/syscall.c:5765
 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline]
 do_syscall_64+0xf5/0x240 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83
 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f
RIP: 0033:0x7f1dbe94ce29
Code: 28 00 00 00 75 05 48 83 c4 28 c3 e8 c1 17 00 00 90 48 89 f8 48 89 f7 48 89 d6 48 89 ca 4d 89 c2 4d 89 c8 4c 8b 4c 24 08 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 c7 c1 b8 ff ff ff f7 d8 64 89 01 48
RSP: 002b:00007ffff608ae88 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000141
RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: 00007f1dbe94ce29
RDX: 0000000000000020 RSI: 0000000020000080 RDI: 0000000000000003
RBP: 00000000000f4240 R08: 00000000000000a0 R09: 00000000000000a0
R10: 00000000000000a0 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000001
R13: 0000000000000000 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 0000000000000000
 </TASK>


---
If you want syzbot to run the reproducer, reply with:
#syz test: git://repo/address.git branch-or-commit-hash
If you attach or paste a git patch, syzbot will apply it before testing.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ