[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240429200039.GH516117@kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2024 21:00:39 +0100
From: Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>
To: Florian Fainelli <florian.fainelli@...adcom.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 2/2] net: dsa: Remove adjust_link paths
On Mon, Apr 29, 2024 at 09:54:05AM -0700, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> Now that we no longer any drivers using PHYLIB's adjust_link callback,
> remove all paths that made use of adjust_link as well as the associated
> functions.
>
> Signed-off-by: Florian Fainelli <florian.fainelli@...adcom.com>
...
> @@ -1616,17 +1597,13 @@ static void dsa_port_phylink_mac_link_down(struct phylink_config *config,
> phy_interface_t interface)
> {
> struct dsa_port *dp = dsa_phylink_to_port(config);
> - struct phy_device *phydev = NULL;
Hi Florian,
I'm wondering if some changes got lost somewhere.
phydev is removed here...
> struct dsa_switch *ds = dp->ds;
>
> if (dsa_port_is_user(dp))
> phydev = dp->user->phydev;
... assigned here, but not used.
Perhaps the three lines above should be removed?
>
> - if (!ds->ops->phylink_mac_link_down) {
> - if (ds->ops->adjust_link && phydev)
> - ds->ops->adjust_link(ds, dp->index, phydev);
> + if (!ds->ops->phylink_mac_link_down)
> return;
> - }
>
> ds->ops->phylink_mac_link_down(ds, dp->index, mode, interface);
> }
...
--
pw-client: changes-requested
Powered by blists - more mailing lists