netdev - Re: [PATCH][next] Bluetooth: hci_conn: Use __counted

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <b552b828-ffa3-48aa-bb13-addee866dfa4@embeddedor.com>
Date: Thu, 2 May 2024 20:53:42 -0600
From: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavo@...eddedor.com>
To: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
 "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavoars@...nel.org>
Cc: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@...tmann.org>,
 Johan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@...il.com>,
 Luiz Augusto von Dentz <luiz.dentz@...il.com>,
 "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
 Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
 linux-bluetooth@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH][next] Bluetooth: hci_conn: Use __counted_by() and avoid
 -Wfamnae warning


>> So, use the `DEFINE_FLEX()` helper for an on-stack definition of
>> a flexible structure where the size of the flexible-array member
>> is known at compile-time, and refactor the rest of the code,
>> accordingly.
>>
>> With these changes, fix the following warning:
>> net/bluetooth/hci_conn.c:669:41: warning: structure containing a flexible array member is not at the end of another structure [-Wflex-array-member-not-at-end]
>>
>> Link: https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/202
>> Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@...nel.org>
> 
> Nice! This looks really clean; I'll point people at this patch when they
> want to see these kinds of conversions. It has it all! :)

I really enjoyed writing it!

It was great to find out I could remove that global struct. :)

> 
> Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
> 

Thanks!
--
Gustavo