netdev - [PATCH v2 1/2] e1000e: let the sleep codes run every time

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20240503101824.32717-1-en-wei.wu@canonical.com>
Date: Fri,  3 May 2024 18:18:24 +0800
From: Ricky Wu <en-wei.wu@...onical.com>
To: jesse.brandeburg@...el.com
Cc: anthony.l.nguyen@...el.com,
	intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org,
	davem@...emloft.net,
	edumazet@...gle.com,
	kuba@...nel.org,
	pabeni@...hat.com,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	rickywu0421@...il.com,
	en-wei.wu@...onical.com
Subject: [PATCH v2 1/2] e1000e: let the sleep codes run every time

Originally, the sleep codes being moved forward only
ran if we met some conditions (e.g. BMSR_LSTATUS bit
not set in phy_status). Moving these sleep codes forward
makes the usec_interval take effect every time.

Signed-off-by: Ricky Wu <en-wei.wu@...onical.com>
---

In v2:
* Split the sleep codes into this patch

 drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/phy.c | 9 +++++----
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/phy.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/phy.c
index 93544f1cc2a5..4a58d56679c9 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/phy.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/phy.c
@@ -1777,6 +1777,11 @@ s32 e1000e_phy_has_link_generic(struct e1000_hw *hw, u32 iterations,
 
 	*success = false;
 	for (i = 0; i < iterations; i++) {
+		if (usec_interval >= 1000)
+			msleep(usec_interval / 1000);
+		else
+			udelay(usec_interval);
+
 		/* Some PHYs require the MII_BMSR register to be read
 		 * twice due to the link bit being sticky.  No harm doing
 		 * it across the board.
@@ -1799,10 +1804,6 @@ s32 e1000e_phy_has_link_generic(struct e1000_hw *hw, u32 iterations,
 			*success = true;
 			break;
 		}
-		if (usec_interval >= 1000)
-			msleep(usec_interval / 1000);
-		else
-			udelay(usec_interval);
 	}
 
 	return ret_val;
-- 
2.40.1