[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240506140533.GD720810@ragnatech.se>
Date: Mon, 6 May 2024 16:05:33 +0200
From: Niklas Söderlund <niklas.soderlund+renesas@...natech.se>
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Cc: Yoshihiro Shimoda <yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@...esas.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [net-next] net: ethernet: rtsn: Add support for Renesas
Ethernet-TSN
Hi Andrew,
Thanks for this explanation, it helps understand what's going on.
On 2024-05-06 03:51:45 +0200, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> What PHY is this? Does it have C22 registers? Can it be identified via
> C22 registers 2 and 3?
The PHY in question is mv88q2110 (drivers/net/phy/marvell-88q2xxx.c),
unfortunately I do not have a datasheet for it so I can't tell you much
about it.
<snip>
>
> So i would drop the compatible. See if C22 is sufficient to get the
> correct driver loaded.
- Remove C45 compatible; Remove C45 read/write in driver
The PHY is identified as "Generic PHY", and the correct PHY driver is
not used. I can't test more than that as the generic PHY driver do not
implement some quirks I need to get the link up.
- Remove C45 compatible; Keep C45 read/write in driver
The correct PHY driver is used and everything works.
- Keep C45 compatible; Remove C45 read/write in driver
As described earlier in this thread, the MAC driver can't connect to
the PHY as the call-chain described earlier fails.
How would you suggest I move forward here? Shall I keep the C45 over C22
read/write in the driver or can I do something else more clever?
--
Kind Regards,
Niklas Söderlund
Powered by blists - more mailing lists