[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240506185837.0f1db786@kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 6 May 2024 18:58:37 -0700
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@...il.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, andrew@...n.ch, jiri@...nulli.us,
horms@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v4 4/6] net: tn40xx: add basic Rx handling
On Thu, 2 May 2024 08:05:50 +0900 FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
> @@ -745,6 +1248,21 @@ static irqreturn_t tn40_isr_napi(int irq, void *dev)
> return IRQ_HANDLED;
> }
>
> +static int tn40_poll(struct napi_struct *napi, int budget)
> +{
> + struct tn40_priv *priv = container_of(napi, struct tn40_priv, napi);
> + int work_done;
> +
> + tn40_tx_cleanup(priv);
> +
> + work_done = tn40_rx_receive(priv, &priv->rxd_fifo0, budget);
> + if (work_done < budget) {
> + napi_complete(napi);
napi_complete_done() works better with busy polling and such
> + tn40_enable_interrupts(priv);
> + }
> + return work_done;
> +}
> +
> + netif_napi_del(&priv->napi);
> + napi_disable(&priv->napi);
These two lines are likely in the wrong order
Powered by blists - more mailing lists