[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20240508.162618.236220769643680941.fujita.tomonori@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 08 May 2024 16:26:18 +0900 (JST)
From: FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@...il.com>
To: pabeni@...hat.com
Cc: fujita.tomonori@...il.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org, andrew@...n.ch,
kuba@...nel.org, jiri@...nulli.us, horms@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v4 4/6] net: tn40xx: add basic Rx handling
Hi,
Thanks for reviewing the patch!
On Mon, 06 May 2024 11:20:55 +0200
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, 2024-05-02 at 08:05 +0900, FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
>> +static struct tn40_rx_page *tn40_rx_page_alloc(struct tn40_priv *priv)
>> +{
>> + struct tn40_rx_page *rx_page = &priv->rx_page_table.rx_pages;
>> + int page_size = priv->rx_page_table.page_size;
>> + struct page *page;
>> + gfp_t gfp_mask;
>> + dma_addr_t dma;
>> +
>> + gfp_mask = GFP_ATOMIC | __GFP_NOWARN;
>> + if (page_size > PAGE_SIZE)
>> + gfp_mask |= __GFP_COMP;
>> +
>> + page = alloc_pages(gfp_mask, get_order(page_size));
>> + if (likely(page)) {
>
> Note that this allocation schema can be problematic when the NIC will
> receive traffic from many different streams/connection: a single packet
> can keep a full order 4 page in use leading to overall memory usage
> much greater the what truesize will report.
>
> See commit 3226b158e67c. Here the under-estimation could fair worse.
>
> Drivers usually use order-0 or order-1 pages.
Understood. I fixed the driver to use only order-0 or order-1 pages.
> [...]
>> +static void tn40_recycle_skb(struct tn40_priv *priv, struct tn40_rxd_desc *rxdd)
>> +{
>
> Minor nit: the function name is confusing, at it does recycle in
> internal buffer, not a skbuff.
Sure, I'll go with recycle_rx_buffer instead.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists