[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZjuK4AT-B_NQmFkb@Laptop-X1>
Date: Wed, 8 May 2024 22:23:28 +0800
From: Hangbin Liu <liuhangbin@...il.com>
To: Sabrina Dubroca <sd@...asysnail.net>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
David Ahern <dsahern@...nel.org>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Vasiliy Kovalev <kovalev@...linux.org>,
Guillaume Nault <gnault@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 net] ipv6: sr: fix invalid unregister error path
On Wed, May 08, 2024 at 11:33:18AM +0200, Sabrina Dubroca wrote:
> > ---
> > v2: define label out_unregister_genl in CONFIG_IPV6_SEG6_LWTUNNEL(Sabrina Dubroca)
> > ---
> > net/ipv6/seg6.c | 5 +++--
> > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/net/ipv6/seg6.c b/net/ipv6/seg6.c
> > index 35508abd76f4..6a80d93399ce 100644
> > --- a/net/ipv6/seg6.c
> > +++ b/net/ipv6/seg6.c
> > @@ -551,8 +551,8 @@ int __init seg6_init(void)
> > #endif
> > #ifdef CONFIG_IPV6_SEG6_LWTUNNEL
> > out_unregister_genl:
> > - genl_unregister_family(&seg6_genl_family);
> > #endif
> > + genl_unregister_family(&seg6_genl_family);
>
> Sorry, I didn't notice when you answered my comment yesterday, but
> this will create unreachable code after return when
> CONFIG_IPV6_SEG6_LWTUNNEL=n and CONFIG_IPV6_SEG6_HMAC=n:
Oh.. Didn't notice this...
>
> out:
> return err;
> genl_unregister_family(&seg6_genl_family);
> out_unregister_pernet:
> unregister_pernet_subsys(&ip6_segments_ops);
> goto out;
>
>
> (stragely, gcc doesn't complain about it, I thought it would)
Yes, I also complied the patch with not complain, so I just posted it.
>
>
> The only solution I can think of if we want to avoid it is ugly:
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_IPV6_SEG6_LWTUNNEL
> out_unregister_genl:
> #endif
> +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_IPV6_SEG6_LWTUNNEL) || IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_IPV6_SEG6_HMAC)
> genl_unregister_family(&seg6_genl_family);
> +#endif
> out_unregister_pernet:
> unregister_pernet_subsys(&ip6_segments_ops);
> goto out;
>
> (on top of v2)
>
> For all other cases your patch looks correct.
Thanks, I will check if there are any other workaround. If not, I will do
like what you said.
Hangbin
Powered by blists - more mailing lists