[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240515132738.GD13678@breakpoint.cc>
Date: Wed, 15 May 2024 15:27:38 +0200
From: Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>
To: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
Cc: "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>,
Jozsef Kadlecsik <kadlec@...filter.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org, coreteam@...filter.org,
eric.dumazet@...il.com, syzbot <syzkaller@...glegroups.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] netfilter: nfnetlink_queue: acquire rcu_read_lock()
in instance_destroy_rcu()
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com> wrote:
> diff --git a/net/netfilter/nfnetlink_queue.c b/net/netfilter/nfnetlink_queue.c
> index 00f4bd21c59b419e96794127693c21ccb05e45b0..f1c31757e4969e8f975c7a1ebbc3b96148ec9724 100644
> --- a/net/netfilter/nfnetlink_queue.c
> +++ b/net/netfilter/nfnetlink_queue.c
> @@ -169,7 +169,9 @@ instance_destroy_rcu(struct rcu_head *head)
> struct nfqnl_instance *inst = container_of(head, struct nfqnl_instance,
> rcu);
>
> + rcu_read_lock();
> nfqnl_flush(inst, NULL, 0);
> + rcu_read_unlock();
That works too. I sent a different patch for the same issue yesterday:
https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/netfilter-devel/patch/20240514103133.2784-1-fw@strlen.de/
If you prefer Erics patch thats absolutely fine with me, I'll rebase in
that case to keep the selftest around.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists