netdev - Re: [PATCH net] netfilter: nfnetlink_queue: acquire rcu_read_lock() in instance_destroy

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CANn89iJUMN6VOkhLi__EH2VxMF1XatEn2x-n=0tLQ1+Bk3u+GQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 15 May 2024 15:39:23 +0200
From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
To: Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>
Cc: "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, 
	Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>, 
	Jozsef Kadlecsik <kadlec@...filter.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org, 
	netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org, coreteam@...filter.org, 
	eric.dumazet@...il.com, syzbot <syzkaller@...glegroups.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] netfilter: nfnetlink_queue: acquire rcu_read_lock()
 in instance_destroy_rcu()

On Wed, May 15, 2024 at 3:27 PM Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de> wrote:
>
> Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com> wrote:
> > diff --git a/net/netfilter/nfnetlink_queue.c b/net/netfilter/nfnetlink_queue.c
> > index 00f4bd21c59b419e96794127693c21ccb05e45b0..f1c31757e4969e8f975c7a1ebbc3b96148ec9724 100644
> > --- a/net/netfilter/nfnetlink_queue.c
> > +++ b/net/netfilter/nfnetlink_queue.c
> > @@ -169,7 +169,9 @@ instance_destroy_rcu(struct rcu_head *head)
> >       struct nfqnl_instance *inst = container_of(head, struct nfqnl_instance,
> >                                                  rcu);
> >
> > +     rcu_read_lock();
> >       nfqnl_flush(inst, NULL, 0);
> > +     rcu_read_unlock();
>
> That works too.  I sent a different patch for the same issue yesterday:
>
> https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/netfilter-devel/patch/20240514103133.2784-1-fw@strlen.de/
>
> If you prefer Erics patch thats absolutely fine with me, I'll rebase in
> that case to keep the selftest around.

I missed your patch, otherwise I would have done nothing ;)

I saw the recent changes about nf_reinject() and tried to have a patch
that would be easily backported without conflicts.

Do you think the splat is caused by recent changes, or is it simply
syzbot getting smarter ?

Thanks !