[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240515141023.GE13678@breakpoint.cc>
Date: Wed, 15 May 2024 16:10:23 +0200
From: Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>
To: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
Cc: Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>,
Jozsef Kadlecsik <kadlec@...filter.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org, coreteam@...filter.org,
eric.dumazet@...il.com, syzbot <syzkaller@...glegroups.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] netfilter: nfnetlink_queue: acquire rcu_read_lock()
in instance_destroy_rcu()
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com> wrote:
> > If you prefer Erics patch thats absolutely fine with me, I'll rebase in
> > that case to keep the selftest around.
>
> I missed your patch, otherwise I would have done nothing ;)
>
> I saw the recent changes about nf_reinject() and tried to have a patch
> that would be easily backported without conflicts.
Right, makes sense from that pov.
I think its fine to apply the patch in this case, I'll followup later.
Thus:
Acked-by: Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>
> Do you think the splat is caused by recent changes, or is it simply
> syzbot getting smarter ?
Its old bug, AFAICS your Fixes tag is correct.
1. Userspace prog needs to subscribe to queue x
2. iptables/nftables rule needs to send packets to queue x
3. actual packets that match that have to be sent
4. Userspace program needs to exit while at least one packet
is queued
Amazing that syzbot managed to hit all 4 checkboxes :)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists