netdev - Re: [PATCH 1/6] workqueue: Inherit NOIO and NOFS alloc flags

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <DD2C1016-9F92-4088-A239-BBA6063CCE41@oracle.com>
Date: Wed, 15 May 2024 14:11:59 +0000
From: Haakon Bugge <haakon.bugge@...cle.com>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
CC: OFED mailing list <linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org>,
        open list
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        "rds-devel@....oracle.com" <rds-devel@....oracle.com>,
        Jason Gunthorpe
	<jgg@...pe.ca>, Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>,
        Saeed Mahameed
	<saeedm@...dia.com>, Tariq Toukan <tariqt@...dia.com>,
        "David S . Miller"
	<davem@...emloft.net>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Jakub Kicinski
	<kuba@...nel.org>,
        Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
        Lai Jiangshan
	<jiangshanlai@...il.com>,
        Allison Henderson <allison.henderson@...cle.com>,
        Manjunath Patil <manjunath.b.patil@...cle.com>,
        Mark Zhang
	<markzhang@...dia.com>,
        Chuck Lever III <chuck.lever@...cle.com>,
        Shiraz
 Saleem <shiraz.saleem@...el.com>,
        Yang Li <yang.lee@...ux.alibaba.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] workqueue: Inherit NOIO and NOFS alloc flags

Hi Tejun,


> On 14 May 2024, at 18:49, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org> wrote:
> 
> Hello,
> 
> On Tue, May 14, 2024 at 01:48:24PM +0000, Haakon Bugge wrote:
> 
> I haven't seen the code yet, so can't tell for sure but if you're
> automatically inherting these flags from the scheduling site, I don't think
> that's gonna work. Note that getting a different, more permissive,
> allocation context is one of reasons why one might want to use workqueues,
> so it'd have to be explicit whether it's in workqueue or in its users.

I wanted to hold off sending the v2 if it came in more comments, but I have sent it now.


Thxs, Håkon