netdev - Re: [PATCH net v2 1/2] af_unix: Fix garbage collection of embryos carrying OOB with SCM

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20240517122419.0c9a0539@kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 17 May 2024 12:24:19 -0700
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@...zon.com>
Cc: <mhal@...x.co>, <davem@...emloft.net>, <edumazet@...gle.com>,
 <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <pabeni@...hat.com>, <shuah@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v2 1/2] af_unix: Fix garbage collection of embryos
 carrying OOB with SCM_RIGHTS

On Fri, 17 May 2024 16:47:42 +0900 Kuniyuki Iwashima wrote:
> From: Michal Luczaj <mhal@...x.co>
> Date: Fri, 17 May 2024 07:59:16 +0200
> > One question: git send-email automatically adds my Signed-off-by to your
> > patch (patch 2/2 in this series). Should I leave it that way?  
> 
> SOB is usually added by someone who changed the diff or merged it.
> 
> I think it would be better not to add it if not intended. 

My understanding is that Michal should indeed add his SOB, as he is 
the one submitting the patch now, and from the "certificate of origin"
we need his assurance that the code is indeed released under the
appropriate license.

If you could reply to your own posting with the SoB, Michal, that'd be
enough.