netdev - Re: [PATCH net v2 1/2] af_unix: Fix garbage collection of embryos carrying OOB with SCM

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <b7c97010-c568-437d-8949-aea4aa909040@rbox.co>
Date: Sun, 19 May 2024 10:47:54 +0200
From: Michal Luczaj <mhal@...x.co>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@...zon.com>
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
 pabeni@...hat.com, shuah@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v2 1/2] af_unix: Fix garbage collection of embryos
 carrying OOB with SCM_RIGHTS

On 5/17/24 21:24, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Fri, 17 May 2024 16:47:42 +0900 Kuniyuki Iwashima wrote:
>> From: Michal Luczaj <mhal@...x.co>
>> Date: Fri, 17 May 2024 07:59:16 +0200
>>> One question: git send-email automatically adds my Signed-off-by to your
>>> patch (patch 2/2 in this series). Should I leave it that way?  
>>
>> SOB is usually added by someone who changed the diff or merged it.
>>
>> I think it would be better not to add it if not intended. 
> 
> My understanding is that Michal should indeed add his SOB, as he is 
> the one submitting the patch now, and from the "certificate of origin"
> we need his assurance that the code is indeed released under the
> appropriate license.
> 
> If you could reply to your own posting with the SoB, Michal, that'd be
> enough.

And there it is:
https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/71ceafc1-269c-44e0-80f0-6f16a1f35f0b@rbox.co/

Thanks,
Michal