[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240521140631.GF764145@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 21 May 2024 15:06:31 +0100
From: Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>
To: Shannon Nelson <shannon.nelson@....com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net, kuba@...nel.org,
edumazet@...gle.com, pabeni@...hat.com, brett.creeley@....com,
drivers@...sando.io
Subject: Re: [PATCH net 0/7] ionic: small fixes for 6.10
On Mon, May 20, 2024 at 06:37:08PM -0700, Shannon Nelson wrote:
> These are a few minor fixes for the ionic driver to clean
> up a some little things that have been waiting for attention.
>
> Brett Creeley (3):
> ionic: Pass ionic_txq_desc to ionic_tx_tso_post
> ionic: Mark error paths in the data path as unlikely
> ionic: Use netdev_name() function instead of netdev->name
>
> Shannon Nelson (4):
> ionic: fix potential irq name truncation
> ionic: Reset LIF device while restarting LIF
> ionic: only sync frag_len in first buffer of xdp
> ionic: fix up ionic_if.h kernel-doc issues
Hi Shannon and Brett,
All of these patches look like good improvements to me.
However, it is only obvious to me why patch 2/7 is a bug fix
suitable for net. Would the other patches be better targeted
at net-next once it reopens?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists