netdev - Re: [PATCH net 0/7] ionic: small fixes for 6.10

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20240522100404.230e4bab@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 22 May 2024 10:04:04 -0700
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: "Nelson, Shannon" <shannon.nelson@....com>
Cc: Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
 davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com, pabeni@...hat.com,
 brett.creeley@....com, drivers@...sando.io
Subject: Re: [PATCH net 0/7] ionic: small fixes for 6.10

On Tue, 21 May 2024 10:14:24 -0700 Nelson, Shannon wrote:
> As always, thanks for taking a look at the set.
> 
> All of these patches are fixing existing code, whether by cleaning up 
> compiler warnings (1, 7), tweaking for slightly better code (3, 4), 
> getting rid of open coding instances (5), and fixing bad behavior (2,6). 
>   It seems to me these fit under the "fixes to existing code" mentioned 
> in our Documentation/process/maintainer-netdev.rst guidelines.

I think that's a stretch, Simon is right. Maybe we can take patches 
1 and 7 without the Fixes tag, just to make your life easier.
But if the rest are fixes I wouldn't know what isn't..