netdev - Re: [PATCH net 0/7] ionic: small fixes for 6.10

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <ebb4a654-05c3-4d17-8ae8-46a4dd9d4db1@amd.com>
Date: Wed, 22 May 2024 15:42:03 -0700
From: "Nelson, Shannon" <shannon.nelson@....com>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc: Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
 davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com, pabeni@...hat.com,
 brett.creeley@....com, drivers@...sando.io
Subject: Re: [PATCH net 0/7] ionic: small fixes for 6.10

On 5/22/2024 10:04 AM, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Tue, 21 May 2024 10:14:24 -0700 Nelson, Shannon wrote:
>> As always, thanks for taking a look at the set.
>>
>> All of these patches are fixing existing code, whether by cleaning up
>> compiler warnings (1, 7), tweaking for slightly better code (3, 4),
>> getting rid of open coding instances (5), and fixing bad behavior (2,6).
>>    It seems to me these fit under the "fixes to existing code" mentioned
>> in our Documentation/process/maintainer-netdev.rst guidelines.
> 
> I think that's a stretch, Simon is right. Maybe we can take patches
> 1 and 7 without the Fixes tag, just to make your life easier.
> But if the rest are fixes I wouldn't know what isn't..

I'll respin them next week for net-next.
sln