netdev - Re: [PATCHv2 net-next] ipv6: sr: restruct ifdefines

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <ZlcwggXSO3qUI1vU@hog>
Date: Wed, 29 May 2024 15:41:23 +0200
From: Sabrina Dubroca <sd@...asysnail.net>
To: Hangbin Liu <liuhangbin@...il.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	David Ahern <dsahern@...nel.org>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
	Vasiliy Kovalev <kovalev@...linux.org>,
	Guillaume Nault <gnault@...hat.com>,
	Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>,
	David Lebrun <david.lebrun@...ouvain.be>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 net-next] ipv6: sr: restruct ifdefines

2024-05-29, 12:09:08 +0800, Hangbin Liu wrote:
> There are too many ifdef in IPv6 segment routing code that may cause logic
> problems. like commit 160e9d275218 ("ipv6: sr: fix invalid unregister error
> path"). To avoid this, the init functions are redefined for both cases. The
> code could be more clear after all fidefs are removed.
> 
> Suggested-by: Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>
> Suggested-by: David Ahern <dsahern@...nel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Hangbin Liu <liuhangbin@...il.com>
> ---
> v2: add a new label to call seg6_iptunnel_exit directly (Sabrina Dubroca)
>     add suggested-by tag (Sabrina Dubroca)

Reviewed-by: Sabrina Dubroca <sd@...asysnail.net>

Thanks.

-- 
Sabrina