netdev - Re: [PATCH v4] ax25: Fix refcount imbalance on inbound connections

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Wed, 29 May 2024 18:22:20 +0300
From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...aro.org>
To: duoming@....edu.cn
Cc: Lars Kellogg-Stedman <lars@...bit.com>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
	linux-hams@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] ax25: Fix refcount imbalance on inbound connections

On Wed, May 29, 2024 at 11:01:52PM +0800, duoming@....edu.cn wrote:
> On Wed, 29 May 2024 17:34:20 +0300 Dan Carpenter wrote:
> > 1) The Fixes tag points to the wrong commit, though, right?  The one
> > you have here doesn't make sense and it doesn't match the bisect.
> 
> I also have tested Lars Kellogg-Stedman`s patch, it works well. I think the Fixes 
> tag shoud be 9fd75b66b8f6 ("ax25: Fix refcount leaks caused by ax25_cb_del()").
> 
> > 2) Can we edit the commitmessage a bit to say include what you wrote
> > about "but rather bind/accept" being paired.  We increment in bind
> > and we should increment in accept as well.  It's the same.
> > 
> > 3) The other thing that I notice is that Duoming dropped part of his
> > commit when he resent v6.
> > https://lore.kernel.org/all/5c61fea1b20f3c1596e4fb46282c3dedc54513a3.1715065005.git.duoming@zju.edu.cn/
> > That part of the commit was correct.  Maybe it wasn't necessary but it
> > feels right and it's more readable and it's obviously harmless.  I can
> > resend that.
> 
> I will resend it latter.

Awesome!  Thanks, and thanks for testing as well.

regards,
dan carpenter