[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <da31ff73-62ab-43c9-a1dd-c62bddbff205@moroto.mountain>
Date: Wed, 29 May 2024 18:22:20 +0300
From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...aro.org>
To: duoming@....edu.cn
Cc: Lars Kellogg-Stedman <lars@...bit.com>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
linux-hams@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] ax25: Fix refcount imbalance on inbound connections
On Wed, May 29, 2024 at 11:01:52PM +0800, duoming@....edu.cn wrote:
> On Wed, 29 May 2024 17:34:20 +0300 Dan Carpenter wrote:
> > 1) The Fixes tag points to the wrong commit, though, right? The one
> > you have here doesn't make sense and it doesn't match the bisect.
>
> I also have tested Lars Kellogg-Stedman`s patch, it works well. I think the Fixes
> tag shoud be 9fd75b66b8f6 ("ax25: Fix refcount leaks caused by ax25_cb_del()").
>
> > 2) Can we edit the commitmessage a bit to say include what you wrote
> > about "but rather bind/accept" being paired. We increment in bind
> > and we should increment in accept as well. It's the same.
> >
> > 3) The other thing that I notice is that Duoming dropped part of his
> > commit when he resent v6.
> > https://lore.kernel.org/all/5c61fea1b20f3c1596e4fb46282c3dedc54513a3.1715065005.git.duoming@zju.edu.cn/
> > That part of the commit was correct. Maybe it wasn't necessary but it
> > feels right and it's more readable and it's obviously harmless. I can
> > resend that.
>
> I will resend it latter.
Awesome! Thanks, and thanks for testing as well.
regards,
dan carpenter
Powered by blists - more mailing lists