[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240531132636.2637995-6-edumazet@google.com>
Date: Fri, 31 May 2024 13:26:36 +0000
From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
To: "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, eric.dumazet@...il.com,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
Subject: [PATCH net 5/5] net: dst_cache: add two DEBUG_NET warnings
After fixing four different bugs involving dst_cache
users, it might be worth adding a check about BH being
blocked by dst_cache callers.
DEBUG_NET_WARN_ON_ONCE(!in_softirq());
It is not fatal, if we missed valid case where no
BH deadlock is to be feared, we might change this.
Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
---
net/core/dst_cache.c | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/net/core/dst_cache.c b/net/core/dst_cache.c
index 6a0482e676d379f1f9bffdda51c7535243b3ec38..70c634b9e7b02300188582a1634d5977838db132 100644
--- a/net/core/dst_cache.c
+++ b/net/core/dst_cache.c
@@ -27,6 +27,7 @@ struct dst_cache_pcpu {
static void dst_cache_per_cpu_dst_set(struct dst_cache_pcpu *dst_cache,
struct dst_entry *dst, u32 cookie)
{
+ DEBUG_NET_WARN_ON_ONCE(!in_softirq());
dst_release(dst_cache->dst);
if (dst)
dst_hold(dst);
@@ -40,6 +41,7 @@ static struct dst_entry *dst_cache_per_cpu_get(struct dst_cache *dst_cache,
{
struct dst_entry *dst;
+ DEBUG_NET_WARN_ON_ONCE(!in_softirq());
dst = idst->dst;
if (!dst)
goto fail;
--
2.45.1.288.g0e0cd299f1-goog
Powered by blists - more mailing lists