netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next v2 00/12] virtnet

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20240530185517.33ba5daa@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 30 May 2024 18:55:17 -0700
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Xuan Zhuo <xuanzhuo@...ux.alibaba.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric
 Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Jason Wang
 <jasowang@...hat.com>, Eugenio Pérez <eperezma@...hat.com>,
 Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>, Daniel Borkmann
 <daniel@...earbox.net>, Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@...nel.org>, John
 Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>, virtualization@...ts.linux.dev,
 bpf@...r.kernel.org, "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 00/12] virtnet_net: prepare for af-xdp

On Fri, 31 May 2024 09:40:14 +0800 Xuan Zhuo wrote:
> On Thu, 30 May 2024 19:54:44 +0800, Xuan Zhuo <xuanzhuo@...ux.alibaba.com> wrote:
> > On Thu, 30 May 2024 07:53:17 -0400, "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com> wrote:  
> > > It's great that you are working on this but
> > > I'd like to see the actual use of this first.  
> >
> >
> > For me, that is easy. But how should we do, if we use one patch set,
> > then the commit number maybe 26, that exceeds 15 (limit of the net next).  
> 
> Hi, Jakub
> 
> There will be a huge patch set (about 25) to support AF-XDP for virtio-net.
> Can I just post this huge patch set if the maintainers of virtio-net agree?

First of all, I see you posted v2 within 4 hours of v1, without really
waiting for Michael to reply. So I guess that 15 patch rule is not the
only one you intend to break?

On v1 Michael asked you to not do the rename, and start with AF_XDP
support. Why don't you do that instead of asking me if you can break
more rules?
-- 
pw-bot: cr