lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Fri, 31 May 2024 09:52:27 +0200
From: Matthieu Baerts <matttbe@...nel.org>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, MPTCP Upstream <mptcp@...ts.linux.dev>
Subject: Re: [TEST] Flake report

Hi Jakub,

On 30/05/2024 19:41, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Thu, 30 May 2024 19:35:56 +0200 Matthieu Baerts wrote:
>>> Yes, we need to find a solution for that. It is not as unstable on our
>>> side [1]. We will look at that next week. If we cannot find a solution
>>> quickly, we will skip the flaky subtests to stop the noise while
>>> continuing to investigate.  
>> Now that the flaky MPTCP subtests results have been ignored, the results
>> look better:
>>
>>   https://netdev.bots.linux.dev/flakes.html?br-cnt=88&tn-needle=mptcp
>>
>> Do you think we could also stop ignoring them on NIPA side?
> 
> Thanks for take care of it, done!

Thank you for the modification!

That could have been predicted: just after having removed them from the
list, these tests appeared to be unstable again! But I guess it is
because there is a conflict between -net and net-next [1], and the
"fixes" that are currently only in -net are no longer included in what
is being validated.

Sorry for the troubles! :)

Cheers,
Matt
-- 
Sponsored by the NGI0 Core fund.


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ