netdev - Re: [TEST] Flake report

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <91138be1-cd25-4efb-8709-2e4cf24be800@kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 31 May 2024 09:52:27 +0200
From: Matthieu Baerts <matttbe@...nel.org>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, MPTCP Upstream <mptcp@...ts.linux.dev>
Subject: Re: [TEST] Flake report

Hi Jakub,

On 30/05/2024 19:41, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Thu, 30 May 2024 19:35:56 +0200 Matthieu Baerts wrote:
>>> Yes, we need to find a solution for that. It is not as unstable on our
>>> side [1]. We will look at that next week. If we cannot find a solution
>>> quickly, we will skip the flaky subtests to stop the noise while
>>> continuing to investigate.  
>> Now that the flaky MPTCP subtests results have been ignored, the results
>> look better:
>>
>>   https://netdev.bots.linux.dev/flakes.html?br-cnt=88&tn-needle=mptcp
>>
>> Do you think we could also stop ignoring them on NIPA side?
> 
> Thanks for take care of it, done!

Thank you for the modification!

That could have been predicted: just after having removed them from the
list, these tests appeared to be unstable again! But I guess it is
because there is a conflict between -net and net-next [1], and the
"fixes" that are currently only in -net are no longer included in what
is being validated.

Sorry for the troubles! :)

Cheers,
Matt
-- 
Sponsored by the NGI0 Core fund.