[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZlmAry5lo/Mrrlhl@shell.armlinux.org.uk>
Date: Fri, 31 May 2024 08:47:59 +0100
From: "Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@...linux.org.uk>
To: Colin Foster <colin.foster@...advantage.com>
Cc: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Claudiu Manoil <claudiu.manoil@....com>,
Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>,
UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com, Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 0/8] Probing cleanup for the Felix DSA driver
On Thu, May 30, 2024 at 10:08:10PM -0500, Colin Foster wrote:
> Hi Vladimir,
>
> On Thu, May 30, 2024 at 07:33:25PM +0300, Vladimir Oltean wrote:
> > This is a follow-up to Russell King's request for code consolidation
> > among felix_vsc9959, seville_vsc9953 and ocelot_ext, stated here:
> > https://lore.kernel.org/all/Zh1GvcOTXqb7CpQt@shell.armlinux.org.uk/
> >
> > Details are in individual patches. Testing was done on NXP LS1028A
> > (felix_vsc9959).
> >
> > Vladimir Oltean (8):
> > net: dsa: ocelot: use devres in ocelot_ext_probe()
> > net: dsa: ocelot: use devres in seville_probe()
> > net: dsa: ocelot: delete open coded status = "disabled" parsing
> > net: dsa: ocelot: consistently use devres in felix_pci_probe()
> > net: dsa: ocelot: move devm_request_threaded_irq() to felix_setup()
> > net: dsa: ocelot: use ds->num_tx_queues = OCELOT_NUM_TC for all models
> > net: dsa: ocelot: common probing code
> > net: dsa: ocelot: unexport felix_phylink_mac_ops and felix_switch_ops
> >
> > drivers/net/dsa/ocelot/felix.c | 62 ++++++++++++-
> > drivers/net/dsa/ocelot/felix.h | 10 +-
> > drivers/net/dsa/ocelot/felix_vsc9959.c | 113 +++++++----------------
> > drivers/net/dsa/ocelot/ocelot_ext.c | 55 +----------
>
> Just FYI I tried testing this but hit an unrelated regression in 6.10,
> and a `git b4` on 6.9.3 has conflicts. So I'm still alive, but probably
> won't get to testing this tonight. Looks good though.
You will need... the net-next tree because it's dependent on a patch I
submitted earlier this week.
--
RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTP is here! 80Mbps down 10Mbps up. Decent connectivity at last!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists