[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <665bcc4869dc3_94803294e9@willemb.c.googlers.com.notmuch>
Date: Sat, 01 Jun 2024 21:35:04 -0400
From: Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@...il.com>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@...il.com>
Cc: edumazet@...gle.com,
pabeni@...hat.com,
davem@...emloft.net,
netdev@...r.kernel.org,
mptcp@...ts.linux.dev,
matttbe@...nel.org,
martineau@...nel.org,
borisp@...dia.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 2/3] tcp: add a helper for setting EOR on tail
skb
Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Fri, 31 May 2024 09:41:30 -0400 Willem de Bruijn wrote:
> > > +static inline void tcp_write_collapse_fence(struct sock *sk)
> > > +{
> >
> > const struct ptr?
>
> Maybe just me, but feels kinda weird for the sole input to be const
> if the function does modify the object it operates on.
Ok. I can see that.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists