lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZmBMa7Am3LIYQw1x@nanopsycho.orion>
Date: Wed, 5 Jun 2024 13:30:51 +0200
From: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>
To: Heng Qi <hengqi@...ux.alibaba.com>
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com, kuba@...nel.org,
	pabeni@...hat.com, mst@...hat.com, jasowang@...hat.com,
	xuanzhuo@...ux.alibaba.com, virtualization@...ts.linux.dev,
	ast@...nel.org, daniel@...earbox.net, hawk@...nel.org,
	john.fastabend@...il.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch net-next] virtio_net: add support for Byte Queue Limits

Mon, May 20, 2024 at 02:48:15PM CEST, jiri@...nulli.us wrote:
>Fri, May 10, 2024 at 09:11:16AM CEST, hengqi@...ux.alibaba.com wrote:
>>On Thu,  9 May 2024 13:46:15 +0200, Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us> wrote:
>>> From: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...dia.com>
>>> 
>>> Add support for Byte Queue Limits (BQL).
>>
>>Historically both Jason and Michael have attempted to support BQL
>>for virtio-net, for example:
>>
>>https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/21384cb5-99a6-7431-1039-b356521e1bc3@redhat.com/
>>
>>These discussions focus primarily on:
>>
>>1. BQL is based on napi tx. Therefore, the transfer of statistical information
>>needs to rely on the judgment of use_napi. When the napi mode is switched to
>>orphan, some statistical information will be lost, resulting in temporary
>>inaccuracy in BQL.
>>
>>2. If tx dim is supported, orphan mode may be removed and tx irq will be more
>>reasonable. This provides good support for BQL.
>
>But when the device does not support dim, the orphan mode is still
>needed, isn't it?

Heng, is my assuption correct here? Thanks!

>
>>
>>Thanks.
>>
>>> 
>>> Signed-off-by: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...dia.com>
>>> ---
>>>  drivers/net/virtio_net.c | 33 ++++++++++++++++++++-------------
>>>  1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
>>> 
>>> diff --git a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
>>> index 218a446c4c27..c53d6dc6d332 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
>>> @@ -84,7 +84,9 @@ struct virtnet_stat_desc {
>>>  
>>>  struct virtnet_sq_free_stats {
>>>  	u64 packets;
>>> +	u64 xdp_packets;
>>>  	u64 bytes;
>>> +	u64 xdp_bytes;
>>>  };
>>>  
>>>  struct virtnet_sq_stats {
>>> @@ -512,19 +514,19 @@ static void __free_old_xmit(struct send_queue *sq, bool in_napi,
>>>  	void *ptr;
>>>  
>>>  	while ((ptr = virtqueue_get_buf(sq->vq, &len)) != NULL) {
>>> -		++stats->packets;
>>> -
>>>  		if (!is_xdp_frame(ptr)) {
>>>  			struct sk_buff *skb = ptr;
>>>  
>>>  			pr_debug("Sent skb %p\n", skb);
>>>  
>>> +			stats->packets++;
>>>  			stats->bytes += skb->len;
>>>  			napi_consume_skb(skb, in_napi);
>>>  		} else {
>>>  			struct xdp_frame *frame = ptr_to_xdp(ptr);
>>>  
>>> -			stats->bytes += xdp_get_frame_len(frame);
>>> +			stats->xdp_packets++;
>>> +			stats->xdp_bytes += xdp_get_frame_len(frame);
>>>  			xdp_return_frame(frame);
>>>  		}
>>>  	}
>>> @@ -965,7 +967,8 @@ static void virtnet_rq_unmap_free_buf(struct virtqueue *vq, void *buf)
>>>  	virtnet_rq_free_buf(vi, rq, buf);
>>>  }
>>>  
>>> -static void free_old_xmit(struct send_queue *sq, bool in_napi)
>>> +static void free_old_xmit(struct send_queue *sq, struct netdev_queue *txq,
>>> +			  bool in_napi)
>>>  {
>>>  	struct virtnet_sq_free_stats stats = {0};
>>>  
>>> @@ -974,9 +977,11 @@ static void free_old_xmit(struct send_queue *sq, bool in_napi)
>>>  	/* Avoid overhead when no packets have been processed
>>>  	 * happens when called speculatively from start_xmit.
>>>  	 */
>>> -	if (!stats.packets)
>>> +	if (!stats.packets && !stats.xdp_packets)
>>>  		return;
>>>  
>>> +	netdev_tx_completed_queue(txq, stats.packets, stats.bytes);
>>> +
>>>  	u64_stats_update_begin(&sq->stats.syncp);
>>>  	u64_stats_add(&sq->stats.bytes, stats.bytes);
>>>  	u64_stats_add(&sq->stats.packets, stats.packets);
>>> @@ -1013,13 +1018,15 @@ static void check_sq_full_and_disable(struct virtnet_info *vi,
>>>  	 * early means 16 slots are typically wasted.
>>>  	 */
>>>  	if (sq->vq->num_free < 2+MAX_SKB_FRAGS) {
>>> -		netif_stop_subqueue(dev, qnum);
>>> +		struct netdev_queue *txq = netdev_get_tx_queue(dev, qnum);
>>> +
>>> +		netif_tx_stop_queue(txq);
>>>  		if (use_napi) {
>>>  			if (unlikely(!virtqueue_enable_cb_delayed(sq->vq)))
>>>  				virtqueue_napi_schedule(&sq->napi, sq->vq);
>>>  		} else if (unlikely(!virtqueue_enable_cb_delayed(sq->vq))) {
>>>  			/* More just got used, free them then recheck. */
>>> -			free_old_xmit(sq, false);
>>> +			free_old_xmit(sq, txq, false);
>>>  			if (sq->vq->num_free >= 2+MAX_SKB_FRAGS) {
>>>  				netif_start_subqueue(dev, qnum);
>>>  				virtqueue_disable_cb(sq->vq);
>>> @@ -2319,7 +2326,7 @@ static void virtnet_poll_cleantx(struct receive_queue *rq)
>>>  
>>>  		do {
>>>  			virtqueue_disable_cb(sq->vq);
>>> -			free_old_xmit(sq, true);
>>> +			free_old_xmit(sq, txq, true);
>>>  		} while (unlikely(!virtqueue_enable_cb_delayed(sq->vq)));
>>>  
>>>  		if (sq->vq->num_free >= 2 + MAX_SKB_FRAGS)
>>> @@ -2471,7 +2478,7 @@ static int virtnet_poll_tx(struct napi_struct *napi, int budget)
>>>  	txq = netdev_get_tx_queue(vi->dev, index);
>>>  	__netif_tx_lock(txq, raw_smp_processor_id());
>>>  	virtqueue_disable_cb(sq->vq);
>>> -	free_old_xmit(sq, true);
>>> +	free_old_xmit(sq, txq, true);
>>>  
>>>  	if (sq->vq->num_free >= 2 + MAX_SKB_FRAGS)
>>>  		netif_tx_wake_queue(txq);
>>> @@ -2553,7 +2560,7 @@ static netdev_tx_t start_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *dev)
>>>  	struct send_queue *sq = &vi->sq[qnum];
>>>  	int err;
>>>  	struct netdev_queue *txq = netdev_get_tx_queue(dev, qnum);
>>> -	bool kick = !netdev_xmit_more();
>>> +	bool xmit_more = netdev_xmit_more();
>>>  	bool use_napi = sq->napi.weight;
>>>  
>>>  	/* Free up any pending old buffers before queueing new ones. */
>>> @@ -2561,9 +2568,9 @@ static netdev_tx_t start_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *dev)
>>>  		if (use_napi)
>>>  			virtqueue_disable_cb(sq->vq);
>>>  
>>> -		free_old_xmit(sq, false);
>>> +		free_old_xmit(sq, txq, false);
>>>  
>>> -	} while (use_napi && kick &&
>>> +	} while (use_napi && !xmit_more &&
>>>  	       unlikely(!virtqueue_enable_cb_delayed(sq->vq)));
>>>  
>>>  	/* timestamp packet in software */
>>> @@ -2592,7 +2599,7 @@ static netdev_tx_t start_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *dev)
>>>  
>>>  	check_sq_full_and_disable(vi, dev, sq);
>>>  
>>> -	if (kick || netif_xmit_stopped(txq)) {
>>> +	if (__netdev_tx_sent_queue(txq, skb->len, xmit_more)) {
>>>  		if (virtqueue_kick_prepare(sq->vq) && virtqueue_notify(sq->vq)) {
>>>  			u64_stats_update_begin(&sq->stats.syncp);
>>>  			u64_stats_inc(&sq->stats.kicks);
>>> -- 
>>> 2.44.0
>>> 
>>> 

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ