| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <1717587768.1588957-5-hengqi@linux.alibaba.com>
Date: Wed, 5 Jun 2024 19:42:48 +0800
From: Heng Qi <hengqi@...ux.alibaba.com>
To: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>
Cc: davem@...emloft.net,
edumazet@...gle.com,
kuba@...nel.org,
pabeni@...hat.com,
mst@...hat.com,
jasowang@...hat.com,
xuanzhuo@...ux.alibaba.com,
virtualization@...ts.linux.dev,
ast@...nel.org,
daniel@...earbox.net,
hawk@...nel.org,
john.fastabend@...il.com,
netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch net-next] virtio_net: add support for Byte Queue Limits
On Wed, 5 Jun 2024 13:30:51 +0200, Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us> wrote:
> Mon, May 20, 2024 at 02:48:15PM CEST, jiri@...nulli.us wrote:
> >Fri, May 10, 2024 at 09:11:16AM CEST, hengqi@...ux.alibaba.com wrote:
> >>On Thu, 9 May 2024 13:46:15 +0200, Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us> wrote:
> >>> From: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...dia.com>
> >>>
> >>> Add support for Byte Queue Limits (BQL).
> >>
> >>Historically both Jason and Michael have attempted to support BQL
> >>for virtio-net, for example:
> >>
> >>https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/21384cb5-99a6-7431-1039-b356521e1bc3@redhat.com/
> >>
> >>These discussions focus primarily on:
> >>
> >>1. BQL is based on napi tx. Therefore, the transfer of statistical information
> >>needs to rely on the judgment of use_napi. When the napi mode is switched to
> >>orphan, some statistical information will be lost, resulting in temporary
> >>inaccuracy in BQL.
> >>
> >>2. If tx dim is supported, orphan mode may be removed and tx irq will be more
> >>reasonable. This provides good support for BQL.
> >
> >But when the device does not support dim, the orphan mode is still
> >needed, isn't it?
>
> Heng, is my assuption correct here? Thanks!
>
Maybe, according to our cloud data, napi_tx=on works better than orphan mode in
most scenarios. Although orphan mode performs better in specific benckmark,
perf of napi_tx can be enhanced through tx dim. Then, there is no reason not to
support dim for devices that want the best performance.
Back to this patch set, I think BQL as a point that affects performance should
deserve more comprehensive test data.
Thanks.
> >
> >>
> >>Thanks.
> >>
> >>>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...dia.com>
> >>> ---
> >>> drivers/net/virtio_net.c | 33 ++++++++++++++++++++-------------
> >>> 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
> >>>
> >>> diff --git a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
> >>> index 218a446c4c27..c53d6dc6d332 100644
> >>> --- a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
> >>> +++ b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
> >>> @@ -84,7 +84,9 @@ struct virtnet_stat_desc {
> >>>
> >>> struct virtnet_sq_free_stats {
> >>> u64 packets;
> >>> + u64 xdp_packets;
> >>> u64 bytes;
> >>> + u64 xdp_bytes;
> >>> };
> >>>
> >>> struct virtnet_sq_stats {
> >>> @@ -512,19 +514,19 @@ static void __free_old_xmit(struct send_queue *sq, bool in_napi,
> >>> void *ptr;
> >>>
> >>> while ((ptr = virtqueue_get_buf(sq->vq, &len)) != NULL) {
> >>> - ++stats->packets;
> >>> -
> >>> if (!is_xdp_frame(ptr)) {
> >>> struct sk_buff *skb = ptr;
> >>>
> >>> pr_debug("Sent skb %p\n", skb);
> >>>
> >>> + stats->packets++;
> >>> stats->bytes += skb->len;
> >>> napi_consume_skb(skb, in_napi);
> >>> } else {
> >>> struct xdp_frame *frame = ptr_to_xdp(ptr);
> >>>
> >>> - stats->bytes += xdp_get_frame_len(frame);
> >>> + stats->xdp_packets++;
> >>> + stats->xdp_bytes += xdp_get_frame_len(frame);
> >>> xdp_return_frame(frame);
> >>> }
> >>> }
> >>> @@ -965,7 +967,8 @@ static void virtnet_rq_unmap_free_buf(struct virtqueue *vq, void *buf)
> >>> virtnet_rq_free_buf(vi, rq, buf);
> >>> }
> >>>
> >>> -static void free_old_xmit(struct send_queue *sq, bool in_napi)
> >>> +static void free_old_xmit(struct send_queue *sq, struct netdev_queue *txq,
> >>> + bool in_napi)
> >>> {
> >>> struct virtnet_sq_free_stats stats = {0};
> >>>
> >>> @@ -974,9 +977,11 @@ static void free_old_xmit(struct send_queue *sq, bool in_napi)
> >>> /* Avoid overhead when no packets have been processed
> >>> * happens when called speculatively from start_xmit.
> >>> */
> >>> - if (!stats.packets)
> >>> + if (!stats.packets && !stats.xdp_packets)
> >>> return;
> >>>
> >>> + netdev_tx_completed_queue(txq, stats.packets, stats.bytes);
> >>> +
> >>> u64_stats_update_begin(&sq->stats.syncp);
> >>> u64_stats_add(&sq->stats.bytes, stats.bytes);
> >>> u64_stats_add(&sq->stats.packets, stats.packets);
> >>> @@ -1013,13 +1018,15 @@ static void check_sq_full_and_disable(struct virtnet_info *vi,
> >>> * early means 16 slots are typically wasted.
> >>> */
> >>> if (sq->vq->num_free < 2+MAX_SKB_FRAGS) {
> >>> - netif_stop_subqueue(dev, qnum);
> >>> + struct netdev_queue *txq = netdev_get_tx_queue(dev, qnum);
> >>> +
> >>> + netif_tx_stop_queue(txq);
> >>> if (use_napi) {
> >>> if (unlikely(!virtqueue_enable_cb_delayed(sq->vq)))
> >>> virtqueue_napi_schedule(&sq->napi, sq->vq);
> >>> } else if (unlikely(!virtqueue_enable_cb_delayed(sq->vq))) {
> >>> /* More just got used, free them then recheck. */
> >>> - free_old_xmit(sq, false);
> >>> + free_old_xmit(sq, txq, false);
> >>> if (sq->vq->num_free >= 2+MAX_SKB_FRAGS) {
> >>> netif_start_subqueue(dev, qnum);
> >>> virtqueue_disable_cb(sq->vq);
> >>> @@ -2319,7 +2326,7 @@ static void virtnet_poll_cleantx(struct receive_queue *rq)
> >>>
> >>> do {
> >>> virtqueue_disable_cb(sq->vq);
> >>> - free_old_xmit(sq, true);
> >>> + free_old_xmit(sq, txq, true);
> >>> } while (unlikely(!virtqueue_enable_cb_delayed(sq->vq)));
> >>>
> >>> if (sq->vq->num_free >= 2 + MAX_SKB_FRAGS)
> >>> @@ -2471,7 +2478,7 @@ static int virtnet_poll_tx(struct napi_struct *napi, int budget)
> >>> txq = netdev_get_tx_queue(vi->dev, index);
> >>> __netif_tx_lock(txq, raw_smp_processor_id());
> >>> virtqueue_disable_cb(sq->vq);
> >>> - free_old_xmit(sq, true);
> >>> + free_old_xmit(sq, txq, true);
> >>>
> >>> if (sq->vq->num_free >= 2 + MAX_SKB_FRAGS)
> >>> netif_tx_wake_queue(txq);
> >>> @@ -2553,7 +2560,7 @@ static netdev_tx_t start_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *dev)
> >>> struct send_queue *sq = &vi->sq[qnum];
> >>> int err;
> >>> struct netdev_queue *txq = netdev_get_tx_queue(dev, qnum);
> >>> - bool kick = !netdev_xmit_more();
> >>> + bool xmit_more = netdev_xmit_more();
> >>> bool use_napi = sq->napi.weight;
> >>>
> >>> /* Free up any pending old buffers before queueing new ones. */
> >>> @@ -2561,9 +2568,9 @@ static netdev_tx_t start_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *dev)
> >>> if (use_napi)
> >>> virtqueue_disable_cb(sq->vq);
> >>>
> >>> - free_old_xmit(sq, false);
> >>> + free_old_xmit(sq, txq, false);
> >>>
> >>> - } while (use_napi && kick &&
> >>> + } while (use_napi && !xmit_more &&
> >>> unlikely(!virtqueue_enable_cb_delayed(sq->vq)));
> >>>
> >>> /* timestamp packet in software */
> >>> @@ -2592,7 +2599,7 @@ static netdev_tx_t start_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *dev)
> >>>
> >>> check_sq_full_and_disable(vi, dev, sq);
> >>>
> >>> - if (kick || netif_xmit_stopped(txq)) {
> >>> + if (__netdev_tx_sent_queue(txq, skb->len, xmit_more)) {
> >>> if (virtqueue_kick_prepare(sq->vq) && virtqueue_notify(sq->vq)) {
> >>> u64_stats_update_begin(&sq->stats.syncp);
> >>> u64_stats_inc(&sq->stats.kicks);
> >>> --
> >>> 2.44.0
> >>>
> >>>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists