netdev - Re: [PATCH 01/15] net: hbl_cn: add habanalabs Core Network driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <5881b5fd-743d-4310-9b9b-521054e2eb8a@habana.ai>
Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2024 07:51:27 +0000
From: Omer Shpigelman <oshpigelman@...ana.ai>
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>, Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@....de>
CC: Abhilash K V <kvabhilash@...ana.ai>,
        Andrey Agranovich
	<aagranovich@...ana.ai>,
        Bharat Jauhari <bjauhari@...ana.ai>, David Meriin
	<dmeriin@...ana.ai>,
        Sagiv Ozeri <sozeri@...ana.ai>, Zvika Yehudai
	<zyehudai@...ana.ai>,
        "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org" <linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org>,
        "dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org" <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
        LKML
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/15] net: hbl_cn: add habanalabs Core Network driver

On 6/17/24 18:02, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> [Some people who received this message don't often get email from andrew@...n.ch. Learn why this is important at https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification ]
>
> On Mon, Jun 17, 2024 at 04:05:57PM +0200, Markus Elfring wrote:
>> …
>>> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/hbl_cn/common/hbl_cn.c
>>> @@ -0,0 +1,5954 @@
>> …
>>> +int hbl_cn_read_spmu_counters(struct hbl_cn_port *cn_port, u64 out_data[], u32 *num_out_data)
>>> +{
>> …
>>> +   mutex_lock(&cn_port->cnt_lock);
>>> +   rc = port_funcs->spmu_sample(cn_port, *num_out_data, out_data);
>>> +   mutex_unlock(&cn_port->cnt_lock);
>>> +
>>> +   return rc;
>>> +}
>> …
>>
>> Would you become interested to apply a statement like “guard(mutex)(&cn_port->cnt_lock);”?
>> https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.10-rc4/source/include/linux/mutex.h#L196
>
> Hi Markus
>
> We decided for netdev that guard() was too magical, at least for the
> moment. Lets wait a few years to see how it pans out. scoped_guard()
> is however O.K.
>
>    Andrew

Thanks for the reference.
I don't see any other Ethernet driver that uses these so let me first
handle the necessary changes and later on I'll check optional
enhancements.
But yeah, we are always open to improve the code.