netdev - [PATCH net-next v4 4/5] virtio_net: refactor command sending and response handling

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20240619161908.82348-5-hengqi@linux.alibaba.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2024 00:19:07 +0800
From: Heng Qi <hengqi@...ux.alibaba.com>
To: netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	virtualization@...ts.linux.dev
Cc: Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>,
	"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>,
	Xuan Zhuo <xuanzhuo@...ux.alibaba.com>,
	Eugenio Pérez <eperezma@...hat.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
	Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
Subject: [PATCH net-next v4 4/5] virtio_net: refactor command sending and response handling

Refactor the command handling logic by splitting
virtnet_send_command_reply into virtnet_add_command_reply
and virtnet_wait_command_response for better clarity and
subsequent use.

Signed-off-by: Heng Qi <hengqi@...ux.alibaba.com>
---
 drivers/net/virtio_net.c | 53 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------
 1 file changed, 38 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
index 4256b1eda043..807724772bcf 100644
--- a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
+++ b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
@@ -2684,20 +2684,14 @@ static int virtnet_tx_resize(struct virtnet_info *vi,
 	return err;
 }
 
-/*
- * Send command via the control virtqueue and check status.  Commands
- * supported by the hypervisor, as indicated by feature bits, should
- * never fail unless improperly formatted.
- */
-static bool virtnet_send_command_reply(struct virtnet_info *vi,
-				       u8 class, u8 cmd,
-				       struct control_buf *ctrl,
-				       struct scatterlist *out,
-				       struct scatterlist *in)
+static bool virtnet_add_command_reply(struct virtnet_info *vi,
+				      u8 class, u8 cmd,
+				      struct control_buf *ctrl,
+				      struct scatterlist *out,
+				      struct scatterlist *in)
 {
 	struct scatterlist *sgs[5], hdr, stat;
-	u32 out_num = 0, tmp, in_num = 0;
-	bool ok;
+	u32 out_num = 0, in_num = 0;
 	int ret;
 
 	/* Caller should know better */
@@ -2731,18 +2725,47 @@ static bool virtnet_send_command_reply(struct virtnet_info *vi,
 		return false;
 	}
 
-	if (unlikely(!virtqueue_kick(vi->cvq)))
-		goto unlock;
+	if (unlikely(!virtqueue_kick(vi->cvq))) {
+		mutex_unlock(&vi->cvq_lock);
+		return false;
+	}
+
+	return true;
+}
+
+static bool virtnet_wait_command_response(struct virtnet_info *vi,
+					  struct control_buf *ctrl)
+{
+	unsigned int tmp;
+	bool ok;
 
 	wait_for_completion(&ctrl->completion);
 	virtqueue_get_buf(vi->cvq, &tmp);
 
-unlock:
 	ok = ctrl->status == VIRTIO_NET_OK;
 	mutex_unlock(&vi->cvq_lock);
 	return ok;
 }
 
+/* Send command via the control virtqueue and check status. Commands
+ * supported by the hypervisor, as indicated by feature bits, should
+ * never fail unless improperly formatted.
+ */
+static bool virtnet_send_command_reply(struct virtnet_info *vi,
+				       u8 class, u8 cmd,
+				       struct control_buf *ctrl,
+				       struct scatterlist *out,
+				       struct scatterlist *in)
+{
+	bool ret;
+
+	ret = virtnet_add_command_reply(vi, class, cmd, ctrl, out, in);
+	if (!ret)
+		return ret;
+
+	return virtnet_wait_command_response(vi, ctrl);
+}
+
 static bool virtnet_send_command(struct virtnet_info *vi, u8 class, u8 cmd,
 				 struct scatterlist *out)
 {
-- 
2.32.0.3.g01195cf9f