lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2024 21:17:49 +0200
From: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@...hat.com>
To: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@...nel.org>, Sebastiano Miano
 <mianosebastiano@...il.com>, bpf@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc: saeedm@...dia.com, tariqt@...dia.com, edumazet@...gle.com,
 kuba@...nel.org, pabeni@...hat.com, Samuel Dobron <sdobron@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: XDP Performance Regression in recent kernel versions

Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@...nel.org> writes:

> On 18/06/2024 17.28, Sebastiano Miano wrote:
>> Hi folks,
>> 
>> I have been conducting some basic experiments with XDP and have
>> observed a significant performance regression in recent kernel
>> versions compared to v5.15.
>> 
>> My setup is the following:
>> - Hardware: Two machines connected back-to-back with 100G Mellanox
>> ConnectX-6 Dx.
>> - DUT: 2x16 core Intel(R) Xeon(R) Silver 4314 CPU @ 2.40GHz.
>> - Software: xdp-bench program from [1] running on the DUT in both DROP
>> and TX modes.
>> - Traffic generator: Pktgen-DPDK sending traffic with a single 64B UDP
>> flow at ~130Mpps.
>> - Tests: Single core, HT disabled
>> 
>> Results:
>> 
>> Kernel version |-------| XDP_DROP |--------|   XDP_TX  |
>> 5.15                      30Mpps               16.1Mpps
>> 6.2                       21.3Mpps             14.1Mpps
>> 6.5                       19.9Mpps              8.6Mpps
>> bpf-next (6.10-rc2)       22.1Mpps              9.2Mpps
>> 
>
> Around when I left Red Hat there were a project with [LNST] that used
> xdp-bench for tracking and finding regressions like this.
>
> Perhaps Toke can enlighten us, if that project have caught similar 
> regressions?
>
> [LNST] https://github.com/LNST-project/lnst

Yes, actually, we have! Here's the bugzilla for it:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2270408

I'm on PTO for the rest of this week, but adding Samuel who ran the
tests to Cc, he should be able to provide more information if needed.

-Toke


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ