[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CADvbK_dAB3iHmM=nkbxGJca2c_1J-NK3R4241b3RAvV8Q9Q+QQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2024 16:50:59 -0400
From: Xin Long <lucien.xin@...il.com>
To: Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>
Cc: Ilya Maximets <i.maximets@....org>, network dev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, dev@...nvswitch.org,
Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@...il.com>, Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>,
Davide Caratti <dcaratti@...hat.com>, Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>, kuba@...nel.org,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, davem@...emloft.net,
Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>, Aaron Conole <aconole@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 3/3] openvswitch: set IPS_CONFIRMED in tmpl
status only when commit is set in conntrack
On Wed, Jun 19, 2024 at 4:20 PM Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de> wrote:
>
> Xin Long <lucien.xin@...il.com> wrote:
> > > master connection only if it is not yet confirmed. Users may commit different
> > > labels for the related connection. This should be more in line with the
> > > previous behavior.
> > >
> > > What do you think?
> > >
> > You're right.
> > Also, I noticed the related ct->mark is set to master ct->mark in
> > init_conntrack() as well as secmark when creating the related ct.
> >
> > Hi, Florian,
> >
> > Any reason why the labels are not set to master ct's in there?
>
> The intent was to have lables be set only via ctnetlink (userspace)
> or ruleset.
>
> The original use case was for tagging connections based on
> observed behaviour/properties at a later time, not at start of flow.
Got it, I will fix this in ovs.
Thanks.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists