netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next v8 09/13] net: phy: mediatek: Add token ring access helper functions in mtk-phy-lib

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <2c0ce908-55a5-4194-ac7b-68828ed10399@lunn.ch>
Date: Sat, 22 Jun 2024 19:41:55 +0200
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To: Sky Huang <SkyLake.Huang@...iatek.com>
Cc: Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
	Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
	Daniel Golle <daniel@...rotopia.org>,
	Qingfang Deng <dqfext@...il.com>,
	Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
	AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org,
	Steven Liu <Steven.Liu@...iatek.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v8 09/13] net: phy: mediatek: Add token ring
 access helper functions in mtk-phy-lib

On Fri, Jun 21, 2024 at 08:20:41PM +0800, Sky Huang wrote:
> From: "SkyLake.Huang" <skylake.huang@...iatek.com>
> 
> This patch adda TR(token ring) manipulations and add correct

s/adda/adds

plus "adds the correct macro names for"

> macro name for those magic numbers. TR is a way to access
> proprietary register on page 52b5. Use these helper functions

registers

> +/* ch_addr = 0x2, node_addr = 0xd, data_addr = 0x8 */
> +/* clear this bit if wanna select from AFE */
> +/* Regsigdet_sel_1000 */
> +#define EEE1000_SELECT_SIGNEL_DETECTION_FROM_DFE	BIT(4)

Should that be SIGNAL?

	Andrew