lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <bad5be97-d2fa-4bd4-9d89-ddf8d9c72ec0@lunn.ch>
Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2024 15:52:24 +0200
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To: Marek Vasut <marex@...x.de>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
	"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
	Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
	Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
	Joakim Zhang <qiangqing.zhang@....com>,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
	Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
	devicetree@...r.kernel.org, kernel@...electronics.com
Subject: Re: [net-next,PATCH] dt-bindings: net: realtek,rtl82xx: Document
 known PHY IDs as compatible strings

On Mon, Jun 24, 2024 at 01:52:49AM +0200, Marek Vasut wrote:
> On 6/23/24 10:00 PM, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> > >     - $ref: ethernet-phy.yaml#
> > >   properties:
> > > +  compatible:
> > > +    enum:
> > > +      - ethernet-phy-id0000.8201
> > 
> > I'm not sure that one should be listed. It is not an official ID,
> > since it does not have an OUI. In fact, this is one of the rare cases
> > where actually listing a compatible in DT makes sense, because you can
> > override the broken hardware and give a correct ID in realtek address
> > space.
> 
> Hmmm, so, shall I drop this ID or keep it ?
> 
> I generally put the PHY IDs into DT so the PHY drivers can correctly handle
> clock and reset sequencing for those PHYs, before the PHY ID registers can
> be read out of the PHY.

Are there any in kernel .dts files using it? We could add it, if it is
needed to keep the DT validation tools are happy. But we should also
be deprecating this compatible, replacing it with one allocated from
realteks range.

	 Andrew

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ