netdev - Re: [PATCH v6 net-next 3/9] net: ethtool: record custom RSS contexts in the XArray

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <90e2bda8-5f5d-409f-8b4a-b2cd12747c95@intel.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2024 09:17:47 +0200
From: Przemek Kitszel <przemyslaw.kitszel@...el.com>
To: Edward Cree <ecree.xilinx@...il.com>, <edward.cree@....com>
CC: <linux-net-drivers@....com>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	<habetsm.xilinx@...il.com>, <sudheer.mogilappagari@...el.com>,
	<jdamato@...tly.com>, <mw@...ihalf.com>, <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
	<sgoutham@...vell.com>, <gakula@...vell.com>, <sbhatta@...vell.com>,
	<hkelam@...vell.com>, <saeedm@...dia.com>, <leon@...nel.org>,
	<jacob.e.keller@...el.com>, <andrew@...n.ch>, <ahmed.zaki@...el.com>,
	<davem@...emloft.net>, <kuba@...nel.org>, <edumazet@...gle.com>,
	<pabeni@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 net-next 3/9] net: ethtool: record custom RSS contexts
 in the XArray

On 6/20/24 08:37, Edward Cree wrote:
> On 20/06/2024 07:32, Przemek Kitszel wrote:
>> On 6/20/24 07:47, edward.cree@....com wrote:
>>> From: Edward Cree <ecree.xilinx@...il.com>
>>>
>>> Since drivers are still choosing the context IDs, we have to force the
>>>    XArray to use the ID they've chosen rather than picking one ourselves,
>>>    and handle the case where they give us an ID that's already in use.
>>
>> Q: This is a new API, perhaps you could force adopters to convert to
>> not choosing ID and switching to allocated one?
> 
> Yes, that's exactly what the next patch (#4) does, when it introduces
>   the new API.

Thanks, I noticed it only after reading this patch.

I know that there are is v7 already, but I don't know if you just missed
my other comments to this v6 patch, or they are not relevant after you
answering the first question? (Code is not removed in subsequent patch,
so I guess you just missed).