netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next] ipvs: properly dereference pe in ip_vs_add

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <721791d7-4070-a680-2dff-f56d10467494@ssi.bg>
Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2024 20:53:59 +0300 (EEST)
From: Julian Anastasov <ja@....bg>
To: Chen Hanxiao <chenhx.fnst@...itsu.com>
cc: Simon Horman <horms@...ge.net.au>, Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>,
        Jozsef Kadlecsik <kadlec@...filter.org>,
        "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        lvs-devel@...r.kernel.org, netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] ipvs: properly dereference pe in
 ip_vs_add_service


	Hello,

On Wed, 26 Jun 2024, Chen Hanxiao wrote:

> Use rcu_dereference_protected to resolve sparse warning:
> 
>   net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_ctl.c:1471:27: warning: dereference of noderef expression
> 
> Fixes: 39b972231536 ("ipvs: handle connections started by real-servers")
> Signed-off-by: Chen Hanxiao <chenhx.fnst@...itsu.com>
> ---
>  net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_ctl.c | 5 +++--
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_ctl.c b/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_ctl.c
> index b6d0dcf3a5c3..925e2143ba15 100644
> --- a/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_ctl.c
> +++ b/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_ctl.c
> @@ -1369,7 +1369,7 @@ ip_vs_add_service(struct netns_ipvs *ipvs, struct ip_vs_service_user_kern *u,
>  {
>  	int ret = 0;
>  	struct ip_vs_scheduler *sched = NULL;
> -	struct ip_vs_pe *pe = NULL;
> +	struct ip_vs_pe *pe = NULL, *tmp_pe = NULL;

	NULL init is not needed

>  	struct ip_vs_service *svc = NULL;
>  	int ret_hooks = -1;
>  
> @@ -1468,7 +1468,8 @@ ip_vs_add_service(struct netns_ipvs *ipvs, struct ip_vs_service_user_kern *u,
>  		atomic_inc(&ipvs->ftpsvc_counter);
>  	else if (svc->port == 0)
>  		atomic_inc(&ipvs->nullsvc_counter);
> -	if (svc->pe && svc->pe->conn_out)
> +	tmp_pe = rcu_dereference_protected(svc->pe, 1);
> +	if (tmp_pe && tmp_pe->conn_out)
>  		atomic_inc(&ipvs->conn_out_counter);

	Alternative option would be to use 'pe' above and to move
the RCU_INIT_POINTER and pe = NULL with their comment here.
It is up to you to decide which option is better...

Regards

--
Julian Anastasov <ja@....bg>