lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2024 10:26:21 +0300
From: Ido Schimmel <idosch@...sch.org>
To: Adrian Moreno <amorenoz@...hat.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, aconole@...hat.com, echaudro@...hat.com,
	horms@...nel.org, i.maximets@....org, dev@...nvswitch.org,
	Yotam Gigi <yotam.gi@...il.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v5 04/10] net: psample: allow using rate as
 probability

On Tue, Jun 25, 2024 at 10:51:47PM +0200, Adrian Moreno wrote:
> Although not explicitly documented in the psample module itself, the
> definition of PSAMPLE_ATTR_SAMPLE_RATE seems inherited from act_sample.
> 
> Quoting tc-sample(8):
> "RATE of 100 will lead to an average of one sampled packet out of every
> 100 observed."
> 
> With this semantics, the rates that we can express with an unsigned
> 32-bits number are very unevenly distributed and concentrated towards
> "sampling few packets".
> For example, we can express a probability of 2.32E-8% but we
> cannot express anything between 100% and 50%.
> 
> For sampling applications that are capable of sampling a decent
> amount of packets, this sampling rate semantics is not very useful.
> 
> Add a new flag to the uAPI that indicates that the sampling rate is
> expressed in scaled probability, this is:
> - 0 is 0% probability, no packets get sampled.
> - U32_MAX is 100% probability, all packets get sampled.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Adrian Moreno <amorenoz@...hat.com>

Reviewed-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@...dia.com>

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ