lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2024 12:37:24 +0900
From: 박정준 <aha310510@...il.com>
To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 syzbot+6c21aeb59d0e82eb2782@...kaller.appspotmail.com,
 Arseny Krasnov <arseny.krasnov@...persky.com>,
 "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
 Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@...hat.com>,
 Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@...hat.com>, Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>,
 Eugenio Pérez <eperezma@...hat.com>, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
 virtualization@...ts.linux.dev, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] vhost/vsock: always initialize seqpacket_allow

nice patch

> 2024. 5. 16. 오전 12:05, Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@...hat.com> 작성:
> 
> There are two issues around seqpacket_allow:
> 1. seqpacket_allow is not initialized when socket is
>   created. Thus if features are never set, it will be
>   read uninitialized.
> 2. if VIRTIO_VSOCK_F_SEQPACKET is set and then cleared,
>   then seqpacket_allow will not be cleared appropriately
>   (existing apps I know about don't usually do this but
>    it's legal and there's no way to be sure no one relies
>    on this).
> 
> To fix:
>    - initialize seqpacket_allow after allocation
>    - set it unconditionally in set_features
> 
> Reported-by: syzbot+6c21aeb59d0e82eb2782@...kaller.appspotmail.com
> Reported-by: Jeongjun Park <aha310510@...il.com>
> Fixes: ced7b713711f ("vhost/vsock: support SEQPACKET for transport").
> Cc: Arseny Krasnov <arseny.krasnov@...persky.com>
> Cc: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
> Cc: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@...hat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@...hat.com>
> Acked-by: Arseniy Krasnov <avkrasnov@...utedevices.com>
> Tested-by: Arseniy Krasnov <avkrasnov@...utedevices.com>
> 
> ---
> 
> 
> Reposting now it's been tested.
> 
> drivers/vhost/vsock.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/vhost/vsock.c b/drivers/vhost/vsock.c
> index ec20ecff85c7..bf664ec9341b 100644
> --- a/drivers/vhost/vsock.c
> +++ b/drivers/vhost/vsock.c
> @@ -667,6 +667,7 @@ static int vhost_vsock_dev_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *file)
>    }
> 
>    vsock->guest_cid = 0; /* no CID assigned yet */
> +    vsock->seqpacket_allow = false;
> 
>    atomic_set(&vsock->queued_replies, 0);
> 
> @@ -810,8 +811,7 @@ static int vhost_vsock_set_features(struct vhost_vsock *vsock, u64 features)
>            goto err;
>    }
> 
> -    if (features & (1ULL << VIRTIO_VSOCK_F_SEQPACKET))
> -        vsock->seqpacket_allow = true;
> +    vsock->seqpacket_allow = features & (1ULL << VIRTIO_VSOCK_F_SEQPACKET);
> 
>    for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(vsock->vqs); i++) {
>        vq = &vsock->vqs[i];
> --
> MST
> 

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ