[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240516193707.676ed88f@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 16 May 2024 19:37:07 -0700
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
syzbot+6c21aeb59d0e82eb2782@...kaller.appspotmail.com, Jeongjun Park
<aha310510@...il.com>, Arseny Krasnov <arseny.krasnov@...persky.com>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Stefan Hajnoczi
<stefanha@...hat.com>, Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@...hat.com>, Jason Wang
<jasowang@...hat.com>, Eugenio PĂ©rez <eperezma@...hat.com>,
kvm@...r.kernel.org, virtualization@...ts.linux.dev, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] vhost/vsock: always initialize seqpacket_allow
On Wed, 15 May 2024 11:05:43 -0400 Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> There are two issues around seqpacket_allow:
> 1. seqpacket_allow is not initialized when socket is
> created. Thus if features are never set, it will be
> read uninitialized.
> 2. if VIRTIO_VSOCK_F_SEQPACKET is set and then cleared,
> then seqpacket_allow will not be cleared appropriately
> (existing apps I know about don't usually do this but
> it's legal and there's no way to be sure no one relies
> on this).
Acked-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
--
pw-bot: nap
Powered by blists - more mailing lists