[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240703151008.GP598357@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 3 Jul 2024 16:10:08 +0100
From: Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>
To: Faizal Rahim <faizal.abdul.rahim@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@...el.com>,
Tony Nguyen <anthony.l.nguyen@...el.com>,
Vinicius Costa Gomes <vinicius.gomes@...el.com>,
intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH iwl-net v1 3/4] igc: Remove unused qbv_count
On Tue, Jul 02, 2024 at 12:09:25AM -0400, Faizal Rahim wrote:
> Removing qbv_count which is now obsolete after these 2 patches:
> "igc: Fix reset adapter logics when tx mode change"
> "igc: Fix qbv_config_change_errors logics"
>
> The variable qbv_count serves to indicate whether Taprio is active or if
> the tx mode is in TSN (IGC_TQAVCTRL_TRANSMIT_MODE_TSN). This is due to its
> unconditional increment within igc_tsn_enable_offload(), which both runs
> Taprio and sets the tx mode to TSN.
>
> Signed-off-by: Faizal Rahim <faizal.abdul.rahim@...ux.intel.com>
Hi Faizal,
This change looks good to me.
However, it seems more appropriate as a clean-up for iwl-next
once the previous to patches make it there via iwl-net.
That notwithstanding,
Reviewed-by: Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>
...
Powered by blists - more mailing lists