lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZoVuVDhCDxr/wKKE@shell.armlinux.org.uk>
Date: Wed, 3 Jul 2024 16:29:24 +0100
From: "Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@...linux.org.uk>
To: Serge Semin <fancer.lancer@...il.com>
Cc: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>, Andrew Halaney <ahalaney@...hat.com>,
	Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
	"Abhishek Chauhan (ABC)" <quic_abchauha@...cinc.com>,
	Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com>,
	Jose Abreu <joabreu@...opsys.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
	Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] net: stmmac: dwmac4: fix PCS duplex mode decode

On Wed, Jul 03, 2024 at 06:07:54PM +0300, Serge Semin wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 03, 2024 at 04:06:54PM +0200, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 03, 2024 at 01:24:40PM +0100, Russell King (Oracle) wrote:
> > > dwmac4 was decoding the duplex mode from the GMAC_PHYIF_CONTROL_STATUS
> > > register incorrectly, using GMAC_PHYIF_CTRLSTATUS_LNKMOD_MASK (value 1)
> > > rather than GMAC_PHYIF_CTRLSTATUS_LNKMOD (bit 16). Fix this.
> > 
> > This appears to be the only use of
> > GMAC_PHYIF_CTRLSTATUS_LNKMOD_MASK. Maybe it should be removed after
> > this change?
> 
> There is a PCS-refactoring work initiated by Russell, which besides of
> other things may eventually imply dropping this macro:
> https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20240624132802.14238-6-fancer.lancer@gmail.com/
> So unless it is strongly required I guess there is no much need in
> respinning this patch or implementing additional one for now.

Nevertheless, a respin is worth doing with Andrew's suggested change
because this patch will impact the refactoring work even without that
change. We might as well have a complete patch for this change.

(Besides, I've already incorporated Andrew's feedback!)

-- 
RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTP is here! 80Mbps down 10Mbps up. Decent connectivity at last!

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ