[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <d8a15267-8dff-46d9-adb3-dffb5216d539@loongson.cn>
Date: Fri, 5 Jul 2024 18:45:50 +0800
From: Yanteng Si <siyanteng@...ngson.cn>
To: Serge Semin <fancer.lancer@...il.com>
Cc: andrew@...n.ch, hkallweit1@...il.com, peppe.cavallaro@...com,
alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com, joabreu@...opsys.com, Jose.Abreu@...opsys.com,
chenhuacai@...nel.org, linux@...linux.org.uk, guyinggang@...ngson.cn,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, chris.chenfeiyang@...il.com, si.yanteng@...ux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v13 06/15] net: stmmac: dwmac-loongson: Detach
GMAC-specific platform data init
在 2024/7/5 18:16, Serge Semin 写道:
>>> Seeing the discussion has started anyway, could you please find out
>>> whether the multi-channel controller will still work if the MSI IRQs
>>> allocation failed? Will the multi-channel-ness still work in that
>>> case?
>> Based on my test results:
>>
>> In this case, multi-channel controller don't work. If the MSI IRQs
>> allocation
>>
>> failed, NIC will work in single channel.
> What does "NIC will work in single channel" mean? Do the driver
> (network traffic flow with a normal performance) still work even with
> the plat->tx_queues_to_use and plat->rx_queues_to_use fields set to
> eight? If it's then the multi-channel-ness still seems to be working
> but the IRQs are delivered via the common MAC IRQ. If you get to
> experience the data loss, or poor performance, or no traffic flowing
> at all, then indeed the non-zero channels IRQs aren't delivered.
>
> So the main question how did you find out that the controller work in
> single channel?
sorry, I meant that if the MSI allocation failed, it will fallback to
INTx, in which case
only the single channel works. if the MSI allocation failed, the
multi-channel-ness
don't work.
Thanks,
Yanteng
Powered by blists - more mailing lists