[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240705094222.GC1095183@kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 5 Jul 2024 10:42:22 +0100
From: Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>
To: Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, xiyou.wangcong@...il.com, jiri@...nulli.us,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
jhs@...atatu.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2] act_ct: prepare for stolen verdict coming
from conntrack and nat engine
On Thu, Jul 04, 2024 at 01:29:20PM +0200, Florian Westphal wrote:
> At this time, conntrack either returns NF_ACCEPT or NF_DROP.
> To improve debuging it would be nice to be able to replace NF_DROP verdict
nit: debugging
(I don't think there is a need to repost just because of this)
> with NF_DROP_REASON() helper,
>
> This helper releases the skb instantly (so drop_monitor can pinpoint
> exact location) and returns NF_STOLEN.
>
> Prepare call sites to deal with this before introducing such changes
> in conntrack and nat core.
>
> Signed-off-by: Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>
> ---
> No changes, v1 errounously targetted 'net' tree.
Reviewed-by: Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists