lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACMJSestJBr=yXgEXDrZj8djZP6G7udOjCgUpwZhgfowgQGbww@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2024 16:15:49 +0200
From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@...aro.org>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc: Luiz Augusto von Dentz <luiz.dentz@...il.com>, davem@...emloft.net, 
	linux-bluetooth@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: pull request: bluetooth-next 2024-07-14

On Mon, 15 Jul 2024 at 16:01, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> On Mon, 15 Jul 2024 15:55:56 +0200 Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> > Luiz pulled the immutable branch I provided (on which my PR to Linus
> > is based) but I no longer see the Merge commit in the bluetooth-next
> > tree[1]. Most likely a bad rebase.
> >
> > Luiz: please make sure to let Linus (or whomever your upstream is)
> > know about this. I'm afraid there's not much we can do now, the
> > commits will appear twice in mainline. :(
>
> If Luiz does rebases, maybe he could rebase, drop the patches and
> re-pull again? Or, you know, re-pull in the middle of a rebase
> so that build doesn't break. Should be pretty.. doable.. ?

Oh, I thought this already went upstream to net-next? If not, then
sure, Luiz can rebuild his tree.

Bart

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ